Search for: "Amendment to Florida Rules of Judicial Administration"
Results 441 - 460
of 575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 8:22 am
Arizona SCR 1010 (Constitutional Amendment) Requires courts, when making judicial decisions, to uphold and adhere to the laws of the U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:16 pm
Here is a breakdown of the Rule changes you need to know: Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.425 Rule of Judicial Administration 2.425, which was added by the Court’s June 30, 2011 Amendments, contains the overarching principles. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:16 pm
Here is a breakdown of the Rule changes you need to know: Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.425 Rule of Judicial Administration 2.425, which was added by the Court’s June 30, 2011 Amendments, contains the overarching principles. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Maryland Court of AppealsDocket: 10-1016Issue(s): Whether Congress constitutionally abrogated states’ Eleventh Amendment immunity when it passed the self-care leave provision of the Family and Medical Leave Act.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (4th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Title: Sackett v.Environmental Protection AgencyDocket: 10-1062Issue(s): Is there a right to judicial review of an Administrative… [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:48 pm
Burris, The Administrative Process and Constitutional Principles: Separation of Powers, 75 FLORIDA BAR J. 28 (2001) (emphasis added). [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 9:55 am
Arizona SCR 1010 (Constitutional Amendment) Requires courts, when making judicial decisions, to uphold and adhere to the laws of the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2011, 10:58 am
If the Commission believes it inadvisable to make distinctions within Part B, then a variety of considerations, including substantial administrative burdens, may point against retroactivity. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:51 am
The petitioners contend that the new rules are “arbitrary and capricious,” violate the Administrative Procedures Act, and infringe on the First and Fifth Amendments. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:36 pm
Arizona SCR 1010 (Constitutional Amendment) Requires courts, when making judicial decisions, to uphold and adhere to the laws of the U.S. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
No. 100-300, 102 Stat. 445 (1988); codified as amended at 42 USC ss11601-11610; See 42 U.S.C. s 11601 (b) for the congressional intent. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
Arizona SCR 1010 (Constitutional Amendment) Requires courts, when making judicial decisions, to uphold and adhere to the laws of the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 7:05 am
Instead, the Supreme Court could recommend such rules to the legislature, which would have the power to adopt, amend, or reject any proposed or existing rule by law. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
President Ford vetoed major amendments intended to tighten the statute after several narrowing judicial constructions; a Democratic-controlled Congress overrode. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 10:30 am
Arizona SCR 1010 (Constitutional Amendment) Requires courts, when making judicial decisions, to uphold and adhere to the laws of the U.S. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 7:41 am
Intentional Acts: HERPES INFECTION NOT AN 'ACCIDENT,' NEW JERSEY APPEALS COURT RULES, D.V. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 6:45 pm
If implemented, this new rule is projected to raise the number of annually reported transactions from 14 million to 750 million. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm
Brady and held that the Sixth Amendment’s g [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:03 pm
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. 3rd District. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 6:08 pm
Defendant appealed to the First Judicial District Court. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
CroweDocket: 10-377Issue(s): (1) Whether use of a suspect's coerced testimony in a judicial proceeding short of a criminal trial in which penalties may be imposed violates the Fifth Amendment; (2) whether police interview techniques that have garnered judicial approval (such as lying) constitute coercion under the Fifth Amendment when applied to a minor; (3) whether a police officer's solely verbal conduct that does not involve any threat of harm… [read post]
