Search for: "American Express Co. v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 1,495
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Or consider another example: in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:32 am by Miriam Seifter
Finally, the majority offers some assurance in response to concerns expressed by the United States. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 1:15 pm
That’s because the Latin cross is inextricably linked to the Christian belief in the crucifixion of Jesus, the resurrection, and the promise of eternal life—a point emphasized in friend-of-the-court briefs filed by both the Baptist Joint Committee and the American Jewish War Veterans for the United States of America. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 3:43 pm by Emily Hammond
” All the opinions contended with an important prior decision involving pre-emption and the AEA, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 5:20 am by Jack Sharman
Few doctrines are held so dear by so many American lawyers, yet understood by so few, as the concept of privilege between lawyer and client. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 6:38 am by Kristian Soltes
Version 1.0 of the Secure Remote Commerce specification from EMVCo, the major card networks’ standards body, emerged Friday, and almost immediately American Express Co., Discover Financial, Mastercard Inc., and Visa Inc. said they plan to incorporate the SRC process within a matter of months. . . . [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:27 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Split process into looking at unopposed v. new proposals/data. [read post]
14 May 2019, 5:00 am by John Jascob
AmEx had separate co-branding agreements with Costco Canada and Costco United States. [read post]
12 May 2019, 1:01 pm by Benjamin Wittes
He named Nixon as an unindicted co-conspirator in that case. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am by MOTP
 See Nixon, 690 S.W.2d at 548-49.The disposition of the affidavit issue mirrors an earlier case involving American Express, in which the defendant, a former Harris County district court judge, had also filed a controverting affidavit, in which he denied having received the cardmember agreement on which the bank moved for summary judgment, and had specially denied that he had consented to the interest rates charged by American Express. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am by Andrew Hamm
If you were to ask the average citizen what values define the United States, the answer would likely include the right to speak freely without fear of government censorship and a general commitment to a free press. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am by MOTP
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm by John Elwood
Q: What do you call a preview piece discussing CITGO Asphalt Refining Co. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  512 has empowered platforms for artists and all Americans to express themselves. [read post]