Search for: "Ames v. Ames"
Results 441 - 460
of 29,515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
In one of my previous posts, I explained why it's unlikely that a majority of the Justices will hold that the Fourteenth Amendment bars Donald Trump from holding federal office. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am
I am nonetheless not (yet) convinced that he is disqualified from holding office again under Section 3, and I am quite skeptical that Section 3 bars him from appearing on the ballot.The post What If Trump v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:57 am
Am. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm
This is also the underlying constitutional question in the Supreme Court's Moore v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 7:30 am
” A “telephone solicitation” is defined as “an organized activity, program, or campaign to communicate by telephone with residents of Maryland in order to: (i) sell, lease, or rent goods or services; (ii) attempt to sell, lease, or rent goods or services; (iii) offer or attempt to offer a gift or prize; (iv) conduct or attempt to conduct a poll; or (v) request or attempt to request survey information, if the results of the survey will be used directly to solicit… [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:33 pm
A plea to Delaware jurists: Chancellor McCormick's Tornetta v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:22 pm
If you would like to see what I mean, check out Throckmorton v Moon, 10 Ohio 42 (1840) and Boyd's Lessee v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 9:21 am
These issues came up in the unreported (non-precedential) case of K.K. v. [read post]
Hunter’s Heroic Epic: Biden Files Motion Comparing Himself to Dead Romanovs and Ancient Greek Heroes
1 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
Hunter v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:45 pm
(Tannen Maury/UPI/Newscom)Today, I filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
InPadavan v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:39 am
PlaceKay v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
In Johannessen v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
From Park v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 11:00 pm
I am pleased to see nearly a dozen of my own VSED publications cited. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
v=BxL9DRdk6Xc New Animation: End Hare Coursing In a world where compassion and empathy should be our guiding principles, it is disheartening to discover that some individuals derive enjoyment and profit from the suffering of innocent creatures. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 2:15 pm
It’s all about supply and demand. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 5:26 am
A recent court case (Cognex Corporation v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
Today represents Part 2A which covers Sections I-V of Chief Justice Crampton’s decision. [read post]
