Search for: "Amy A. Breyer"
Results 441 - 460
of 514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Dec 2015, 4:04 am
Judgmental Santa by Richard Elzey; lumps of coal by Jeffrey Beall; adorable kitty by Bill and Vicki T; cookies by Amy. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 11:08 am
PLAIN LANGUAGE: The Court held that Amy Imburgia’s contract with DIRECTV required her arbitrate any disputes with DIRECTV, which means that Imburgia lost the right to sue DIRECTV in a court. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 6:06 am
I sympathize with Justice Breyer’s point. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 11:29 am
Amy Howe also contributed to this round-up. [read post]
14 May 2015, 6:12 am
District Judge Amy Berman Jackson. [read post]
13 May 2015, 3:00 pm
Circuit and Judge Amy Berman Jackson of the U.S. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am
District Judge Amy Berman Jackson. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 12:10 am
Morrison, Amy S. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
In this post, I’ll first elaborate on what I understand the concern to be, and then explain why I believe that the consequence that Justice Breyer hypothesizes, while certainly a valid matter to consider, does not in fact arise and need not constrain development of Confrontation Clause doctrine.I think what Justice Breyer is responding to is basically this: Over 200 years, a complex web of hearsay law has been worked out, reflecting judgments of what hearsay… [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 11:55 pm
In this post, I’ll first elaborate on what I understand the concern to be, and then explain why I believe that the consequence that Justice Breyer hypothesizes, while certainly a valid matter to consider, does not in fact arise and need not constrain development of Confrontation Clause doctrine.I think what Justice Breyer is responding to is basically this: Over 200 years, a complex web of hearsay law has been worked out, reflecting judgments of what hearsay… [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 2:25 am
’ Under Justice Breyer’s holding, the act of consulting a dictionary – which is how a court might determine “the meaning of a term in the relevant art during the relevant time period” – seems entitled to deference. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 9:05 am
NDU reported on Breyer’s appearance here. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[12] Amy Howe, Justices Take the Measure of Fish Case: In Plain English, SCOTUS Blog (November 5, 2014), http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/11/justices-take-the-measure-of-fish-case-in-plain-english/ [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
RP: You might ask Justice Breyer this question. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 7:51 am
” Lyle Denniston covered the opinion for this blog, Amy Howe explained the ruling in Plain English, and Mark Walsh provided a “view” from the courtroom. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm
” Lyle Denniston covered the opinion for this blog, Amy Howe explained the ruling in Plain English, and Mark Walsh provided a “view” from the courtroom. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 5:38 am
Justice Kennedy, on behalf of himself Breyer, Ginsburg, Kagan, and Alito declared that they're supposed to make it up. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 2:35 pm
Interpreting the statute, Justice Kennedy’s opinion for the Court (joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, and Kagan) concluded that the “proximate result” limitation found in Subsection F applied not just where it appears (in Subsection F) but also to the other parts of the statute. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:14 am
Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito and Kagan. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:07 am
Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Elena Kagan. [read post]
