Search for: "Ani v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 134,513
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2010, 5:32 am by Transplanted Lawyer
But if he is acquitted of any crime, then we have no legally valid option but to let him go free. [read post]
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 10:54 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: Are any United States Supreme Court cases real? [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:52 am
  Who at Bloomington, the headquarters of State Farm, would have so lost any remaining impulses of self-preservation as to give documents to Scruggs? [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 3:50 pm
Nor did the Trust have a physical presence, make any direct investments, or hold any real property in the State. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 2:39 pm
In United States v.Conrad Clinton Blair, No. 12-4427, the Court rejects an expansive reading of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Descamps v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 8:43 pm
The original trust similarly stated that no contest clause of the Trust applies to “any provisions of the instrument” [emphasis added], which necessarily includes the subtrusts created by the same instrument. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 1:32 am
Nationwide and In Re Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation -- I would flat out drop my red Yellowstone mug of decaf with the white moose silhouette in amazement if the result were any different in State Farm's interlocutory appeal of Tuepker v. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
United States and Free Exercise after Fulton (75 ALA. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:01 pm by Jeff Gittins
The United States Court of Federal Claims recently issued its decision in the case of Klamath Irrigation v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 10:16 pm
In its ongoing effort to reduce any chance for physical activity associated with the practice of law, the State Bar's Labor & Employment Law Section is offering a Teleseminar on everyone's favorite wage & hour decision, Brinker Restaurant Corporation v. [read post]
1 May 2015, 12:48 pm by Daily Record Staff
., the identity of the assailant, any error regarding that issue was harmless and does not require reversal of appellant’s convictions. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm by Michael Knapp
United States, or its decision in United States v. [read post]