Search for: "Arnold Doe" Results 441 - 460 of 2,485
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2019, 4:13 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In the Northwest, just about everything does well. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 1:54 am
It is immaterial that the extent of the enrichment which can be achieved may vary from case to case and may on average be less than 2.0-fold....The fact that on very rare occasions the invention is of no practical benefit does not detract from the fact that in the vast majority of cases it is of technical utility. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 11:48 am by David Jensen
Her last CIRM grant ends in March 2020 and although she also has some NIH funding, it does not support the animal testing and other studies needed to move her work toward a clinical trial. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:32 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Charlotte Injury Lawyer Matt Arnold answers the question: “What is Maximum Medical Improvement and how does it effect my claim? [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 11:54 am by Benjamin Wittes
” And so we should ask ourselves: How much does American prestige and influence ebb when we are understood to be ridiculous, even when our allies decline to say it out loud? [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 9:36 am by Florian Mueller
But apart from whether the related appeal (which Justice Arnold was well aware of, but which did not prevent him from holding a purely technical trial last month anyway) will succeed (I hope and believe it will), Conversant needs to prevail on the merits of at least one patent claim in order to have a basis for claiming anything, be the regional scope global, multinational, national, regional, or local.So where does Conversant's overall patent assertion campaign against Huawei… [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 7:50 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Charlotte Personal Injury Attorney Matt Arnold answers the question: How does the law of contributory negligence play a role in my case? [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 2:04 am
In Abraxis (C-443/17) Mr Justice Arnold asked whether, following Neurim (C-130/11), Article 3(d) of the SPC Regulation (Regulation (EC) No 469/2009) permitted grant of an SPC if the active ingredient has previously received marketing authorisation, but the new marketing authorisation is for a product in the form of a new formulation of the active ingredient. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 6:33 am
"Mr Justice Arnold further observed that "[a] patentee with faith in its case on the merits would be unlikely to engage in shielding" (para., 109). [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 10:40 am by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Board Certified Family Law Specialist Matt Arnold answers the question: “How much does it cost to get divorced, and how does the billing process work? [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 9:28 am
The fact that there was no technical reason for Lilly to limit the patent to pemetrexed disodium does not change this conclusion. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:56 am by Rik Lambers
The District Court does not agree: if there is not a known, conscious technical reason for a limitation in the wording of the claims (compared to the inventive concept), then this does not mean that the skilled person should always assume that this limitation should (therefore) not be considered a limitation of the scope of protection. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 1:31 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Charlotte Personal Injury Attorney Matt Arnold answers the question: “The insurance adjuster is saying I am partially negligent what does that mean? [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
Arnold stated that Charity Hospital maintenance staff conducted no activities affecting the condition of the sidewalk in front of the hospital. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 2:00 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Charlotte Injury Lawyer Matt Arnold answers the question: “How much does your firm charge to represent me in a personal injury case? [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:14 pm by Matthew R. Arnold, Esq.
Charlotte Injury Lawyer Matt Arnold answers the question: “What is Maximum Medical Improvement and how does it effect my claim? [read post]
29 May 2019, 12:22 pm
  But, because the judge considered that this was not an evenly balanced case, this factor does not enter the mix. [read post]