Search for: "Asbestos Claimants"
Results 441 - 460
of 556
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2010, 11:32 am
Utah Statute of Limitations for Injuries Caused from Exposure to Asbestos In Utah, you must bring an asbestos claim within three years from the date when you could have discovered your asbestos related injury. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
Some claimants asserted that Texas law was so harsh that Texans were being forced to file out of state, including in California. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 6:07 am
And so we bid farewell to the decade that was. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 4:13 pm
The Appellate Division also emphasized the fact that mere exposure to asbestos fibers was not itself an injury and that given the length of time that it took for asbestos-related diseases to develop, said injuries plainly occurred after any installation operations conducted by Keasbey occurred. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 10:36 am
But in In re Asbestos II Consolidated Pretrial, 1989 WL 56181 (N.D. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:01 pm
The take away message is that when in doubt, the wise claimant's attorney should ask doctor for clarification of any ambiguous opinions. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
After a nine-week trial, a Los Angeles jury ruled in May 2003 that Fuller Austin’s insurers were obligated to contribute over $200 million to a trust fund that the insured had entered into with the underlying asbestos claimants. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:11 am
., the first of the asbestos disease driven bankruptcy cases. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 11:17 pm
Moreover, because asbestos claimants are often the largest class of creditors in asbestos-related bankruptcy proceedings, their lawyers play a major role in deciding who receives payouts from the trusts and how much they get. [read post]
28 Nov 2009, 1:01 pm
Corporate responsibility for asbestos victims and pension promises are also on the bankruptcy radar screen. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:30 am
Doug Kim, a lobbyist for the claimant's attorneys, disclosed that the injured workers' advocates were not invited to partake in the discussion that lead up to crafting the initial drafts of the 2004 California reform legislation SB 899. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:55 am
Sienkiewicz v Greif (UK) Ltd Court of Appeal "A claimant who brought an action in tort for exposure to asbestos dust which resulted in mesothelioma was required to establish a material increase in the risk of contracting the disease because of the tortious exposure. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 3:35 am
Sienkiewicz (administratrix of the estate of Enid Costello decd) v Greif (UK) Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 1159; [2009] WLR (D) 321 "A claimant bringing an action in tort for exposure to asbestos dust resulting in mesothelioma was required to establish that the tortious exposure had materially increased the risk of contracting the disease. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 3:47 pm
UT Law Spring 2010 coastal courses: Climate Change Law & PolicyClass Unique #: 28633 Course #: 179M Instructor: Benjamin/Gholz Credits: 1Wednesday 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm Friday 1:30 pm - 4:30 pm Exam type: Early CLASS MEETS JANUARY 20-FEBRUARY 5.What the course is about. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 3:07 am
In holding that the Kirks were not required to allege causation, the Court relied on cases from this District, see Official Comm. of Asbestos Claimants of G-l Holding, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 9:33 am
(asbestos and product liability), as well as here and here (protection of UAW at expense of creditors).... [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 1:40 am
"
FEDERAL DECISIONS:
In re Congoleum CorporationBANKRUPTCY - Asbestos - Plan Confirmation"Because dismissal is not in the best interest of Congoleum's creditors, the Bankruptcy Court abused its discretion by dismissing the case. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 7:43 am
Despite the famously opaque nature of the administration of bankrupt asbestos defendants' trusts, Kirk Hartley has been doing some digging and finding surprisingly large payout numbers (more than $700,000/claimant) in one case whose details made it into court documents.... [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 6:47 am
Product liability claimants including those with personal injuries from car accidents and asbestos — will have to fight over the bankruptcy estate’s scraps. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 6:40 pm
One blogger suggests that the Justice might have misgivings about the sale cutting off personal injury tort claimants from recovery (see ”What's Bothering Ruthie? [read post]
