Search for: "B. P. P."
Results 441 - 460
of 17,468
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
The EUIPO issued a refusal of the IR based on lack of distinctiveness (Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:14 am
” 2) “An Apple is not an Apple”, at least according to the Swiss Federal Administrative Court… by Peter Schramm “With Judgment of 8 March 2023 (B-1974/2022), the Swiss Federal Administrative Court confirmed the rejection of an opposition by Apple against a trademark showing another stylized apple motif. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 8:42 pm
Peor aún, el 10 de junio Maqueda le escribe (y hace pública) esta nota, de la que extraemos dos párrafos:Los argentinos han sido sorprendidos por sus declaraciones. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
The Supreme Court, in Lord Sales judgment, restates the starting position, as per R v East Sussex County Council, Ex p Tandy (1998) AC 714, that where Parliament imposes a statutory duty on a public authority to provide a specific benefit or service, it does so on the footing that the authority must be taken to have the resources available to comply with that duty. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Demande en répétition de l’indu. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
The dispute before Indiana Judge Matthew P. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:03 am
‘Our primary filing was a request under Rule 262.1(b) of the UPC Rules of Procedure requesting that the Munich section of the central division make available to us all written pleadings and evidence filed on case no ACT_464985/2023. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
The Judge noted that the basic requirements before a Norwich Pharmacal order could be made were that: (1) a wrong had been carried out, or arguably carried out, by an ultimate wrongdoer; (2) an order was needed to enable action to be brought against the ultimate wrongdoer; and (3) the person against whom the order was sought was (a) mixed up in, so as to have facilitated, the wrongdoing; and (b) able or likely to be able to provide the information necessary to enable the… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:09 am
Different classes of PITs are defined in 29 CFR §1910.178(b). [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
Interpreting § 315(c) to allow joinder regardless of time limits renders § 315(b). [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:46 am
Il devient ainsi particulièrement bénéfique que le cadre négocié soit clair entre les parties en présence. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:04 am
In a future release, for each member of the legal team, it will be possible to indicate whether: a) The representative must receive notifications and at which email address. b) The user is the representative or one of the representatives and therefore such user’s name will appear in documents created by the CMS. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:17 pm
The examiner rejected the applications for lacking distinctiveness (Art. 7(1)(b) EUTMR). [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 10:00 am
” Collier on Bankruptcy P 20.01 . [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
§§ 921(a)(33)(B)(ii) and 922(g)(9). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 3:22 pm
A civil harassment rеstraining ordеr is an ordеr by thе court that places a legal barrier bеtwееn thе individual who sought protеction (thе protеctеd party) and thе pеrson against whom it was issuеd. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:22 am
Waters and Stephanie O’Neill Macro, September 22, 2023 New Privacy Laws from Coast to Coast: Comparing California, Virginia and Colorado by Theodore P. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:40 am
One important exception to that rule is foreseen in the VBER in Art. 4(b)(i), (c)(i)(1) and (d)(i). [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
, Nathalie P. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 6:34 pm
Este encuentro es un homenaje a la idea fundadora del Comandante en Jefe Fidel Castro, a su incansable búsqueda del mejor de los caminos hacia la emancipación humana y la supervivencia de nuestra especie, a la que el capitalismo neoliberal empuja irracionalmente hacia su extinción. [read post]
