Search for: "B. v. S." Results 441 - 460 of 57,849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Supreme Court Sends BOOKING.COM Attorney's Fees Ruling Back to Fourth Circuit In View of Peter v. Nantkwest
7 Jul 2020, 3:04 am
USPTO that upheld the award of attorney's fees to the USPTO under Section 1017(b)(3) of the Trademark Act. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
Federal Circuit Says Correction of Inventorship Claims Were Plausible, Vacates District Court Dismissal in Coda v. Goodyear
6 Mar 2019, 10:15 am by Dustin Weeks
The Federal Circuit recently vacated a district court’s decision dismissing a complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). [read post]
IPWatchdog.com | Patent Copyright Trademark - http://www.ipwatchdog.com
IBSA Institut Biochimique, S.A. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2020)
13 Aug 2020, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
§ 112(b). [read post]
Patent Docs - http://www.patentdocs.org/
A Houston Patent Attorney’s Review of: PFIZER INC. v. LEE
28 Jan 2016, 9:02 am by Gene Pierson
§ 154(b), provides for the restoration of patent term in three circumstances: (i) an “A-Delay,” which awards PTA for delays arising from the USPTO’s failure to act by certain examination deadlines; (ii) a “B-Delay,” which awards PTA for an application pendency exceeding three years; and (iii) a “C-Delay,” which awards PTA for delays due to interferences, secrecy orders, and appeals. [read post]
Pierson Patent Law Blog - http://piersonpatentlaw.com/Blog/
Foley on Bush v. Gore
9 Apr 2007, 10:21 pm
Edward B. [read post]
Legal Theory Blog - http://lsolum.typepad.com/legaltheory/
Virginia: Ca. Code Ann. §8.01-355(B) – a Lawyer’s Reconsideration
14 Oct 2009, 7:30 am by Avery T. "Sandy" Waterman, Jr., Esq.
In Andleton v. [read post]
Virginia Injury Attorney Blog - http://www.virginiainjuryattorneyblog.com/
Statistical v. Legal "Significance": Matrixx-Inspired Scholarship
12 Oct 2011, 12:31 pm by Michael Heise
In Matrixx Initiatives Inc. v. [read post]
Empirical Legal Studies - http://www.elsblog.org/the_empirical_legal_studi/
Maybe the FTC Can’t Take That to the Bank: The Supreme Court’s Decision in Liu v. SEC and Its Implications for the FTC’s Ability to Seek Equitable Monetary Relief
13 Jul 2020, 9:36 am by Thomas Dillickrath and Joy O. Siu
”[1] The Court’s recent decision in Liu v. [read post]
Antitrust Law Blog - http://www.antitrustlawblog.com/
TTAB's Loufrani v. Wal-Mart "SMILEY" Case Lands In Chicago Federal Court
22 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
§ 1071(b)(1) seeking judicial review of the TTAB's March 2009 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
TTAB Sustains Nike's Section 2(e)(2) Opposition to "B-MORE" for Clothing
14 Oct 2009, 10:58 pm
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
Dukes v. Wal-Mart: Creative Solutions for Plaintiffs
7 Nov 2011, 5:23 am by webmaster
The Supreme Court’s Dukes v. [read post]
Impact Litigation Journal - http://impactlitigation.com/
En banc CAFC in MedCo v. Hospira: a contract manufacturer’s sale to the inventor of manufacturing services where neither title to the embodiments nor the right to market the same passes to the supplier does not constitute an invalidating sale under § 102(b)
11 Jul 2016, 12:28 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Co. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of CERCLA Contribution Claims by Settling Parties
27 May 2021, 7:52 am by Melissa Golding
United States that a party’s claim for contribution under Section 113(f)(3)(B) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
SPR Environmental Law Blog - https://www.sprlaw.com/blog/
What’s On Their Minds: Does the Arson Offender Statute’s Registry Reduction Provision Violate the Separation of Powers? State of Ohio v. Christian Carlisle
17 Sep 2020, 8:23 am by MBettman
State of Ohio v. [read post]
Legally Speaking Ohio - http://www.legallyspeakingohio.com
Declaratory Relief Class Actions Under Rule 23(b)(2): Sixth Circuit Issues Significant Opinion in Health Insurance Class Action
21 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm by Wystan M. Ackerman
Gooch v. [read post]
Insurance Class Actions Insider - http://www.insuranceclassactions.com/
Commil v. Cisco: Cert Granted as to Invalidity and Inducement Issues
5 Dec 2014, 1:18 pm by Jason Rantanen
§ 271(b); Commil’s brief also presented a second question that the Court did not take: (2) whether the Federal Circuit erred in holding that Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
Unindexed Internet Content Can Be a “Printed Publication” under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)
10 Nov 2012, 12:47 pm by Charles Bieneman
  Voter Verified, Inc. v. [read post]
Software Intellectual Property Report - http://swipreport.com/
Conviction affirmed where the prosecutor's question "strayed from the track" established by MRE/FRE 5-704(b), but the witness's answer did not.
17 Dec 2009, 9:00 pm
Gauvin v. [read post]
Underdog Blog - http://katzjustice.com/underdog/
ASARCO v. Union Pacific
28 Aug 2014, 8:44 am by WIMS
ASARCO v. [read post]
Environmental - Appeals Court - http://environmentalappealscourt.blogspot.com/
DANIEL B. HOLT v. LAURIE L. HOLT
12 Jul 2018, 7:09 am by Daily Record Staff
The agreement provided that Appellant would return all of Appellee’s computer files. [read post]
On the Record - http://thedailyrecord.com/ontherecord/