Search for: "BEENE v. BEENE" Results 441 - 460 of 191,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2008, 9:23 am
Grayson v United Kingdom European Court of Human Rights “It was not incompatible with the notion of a fair hearing in criminal proceedings for the onus of proof to be placed on the accused to provide a credible account of his financial situation, once it has been proved that he had been involved in extensive and lucrative drug dealing over a period of years. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
With the help of Patent Docs readers, we have been assembling a list of amicus briefs that have been submitted in this case. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:10 am
Preparation of heroin syringe does not constitute manslaughter Regina v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 1:59 am
Motorist can reclaim cost of hire car after accident Bee v Jenson (No 2) Court of Appeal “A claimant whose car had been damaged by the defendant's negligence could recover the reasonable cost of a replacement while his own car was being repaired even though the cost of that hire had been paid directly to the hire company by the claimant's own insurers rather than by the claimant himself. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 2:54 am
Divorce pending appeal valid Leman-Klammers v Klammers “It was perfectly reasonable for an English court to grant a decree absolute of divorce to the wife where the husband was waiting for an appeal to be heard in France by the Cour de Cassation on whether the Cour d'Appel de Paris had been correct in holding that the English court had been seised first. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:30 am by Adam Wagner
In a recent court of appeal case, Ahmed & Anor v R [2011] EWCA Crim 184, a man charged with terrorism claimed that the UK had been complicit with his detention and alleged torture in Pakistan, and therefore his prosecution should be stopped (see my post on the case for a full summary). [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 7:50 am by Tracy Thomas
Paula Monopoli, Situating Dobbs, 14 ConLawNOW 45 (2023) This Article applies the concept of constitutional memory to the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:43 am
Louca v Public Prosecutor, Bielefeld, Germany Kaba v Court of First Instance, Creteil, France Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “While a European arrest warrant had to be validated by reference to an enforceable national legal procedure, it need not refer to any other European arrest warrant that might previously have been issued in respect of the alleged offences [...] [read post]
26 May 2009, 3:17 am
R (MM (Burma) and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (DT (Eritrea)) v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 442; [2009] WLR (D) 166 “A person whose asylum claim had been finally determined in country A against him or her and who made a subsequent claim for asylum in country A came within the [...] [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 8:22 am by Calvin Massey
There's been a lot of discussion of the oral argument in FCC v. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
(Akinbolu v Hackney Borough Council (1997) 29 HLR 259 and Birmingham City Council v Qasim & Ors (2009) EWCA Civ 1080 (our note)). [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 8:58 pm by Patent Docs
Correspondingly, Amgen has been the Plaintiff in many of the litigations that have been based on the provisions of the Biosimilar Price Competition and Innovation Act ("BPCIA"). [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:15 pm by Curt Cutting
Supreme Court has denied the defendant's petition for certiorari in one of the punitive damages cases we've been tracking: Stroud v. [read post]