Search for: "BENCH v. STATE" Results 441 - 460 of 7,067
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2011, 4:21 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Iqbal v Mansoor & Ors [2011] EWHC 2261 (QB) (26 August 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Elvington Park Ltd & Anor, R (on the application of) v The Crown Court At York [2011] EWHC 2213 (Admin) (26 August 2011) Scarth (The Living Man) v Governor of HM Prison Armley & Anor [2011] EWHC 2269 (Admin) (26 August 2011) Modhej, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011]… [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 2:22 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Mitchell & Anor v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 1652 (01 July 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Wardle v Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank [2011] EWCA Civ 770 (01 July 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Charles Terence Estates Ltd v The Cornwall Council [2011] EWHC 1683 (QB) (28 June 2011) Bristol Alliance Ltd v Williams & Anor [2011] EWHC 1657 (QB) (01 July 2011) Jani-King (Gb) Ltd.… [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 1:56 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rowley, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 1434 (03 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gallarotti v Sebastianelli [2012] EWCA Civ 865 (03 July 2012) Frey & Ors v Labrouche [2012] EWCA Civ 881 (03 July 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Chhabra v West London Mental Health NHS [2012] EWHC 1735 (QB) (01 June 2012) Stych v Dibble & Anor [2012] EWHC 1606 (QB) (14 June 2012) High Court… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 8:56 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Gnango, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1691 (26 July 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) LK v Sandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust [2010] EWHC 1928 (QB) (15 July 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Wood v Director of Public Prosecutions [2010] EWHC 1769 (Admin) (30 June 2010) Nursing and Midwifery Council v Okon- Burgess [2010] EWHC 1816 (Admin) (05 July 2010) Medical Justice, R (on the… [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 3:13 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Nolan & Anor v R [2012] EWCA Crim 671 (04 April 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Solicitors Regulation Authority v Lawrence & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 421 (03 April 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) McGrath & Anor v Dawkins & Ors [2012] EWHC B3 (QB) (30 March 2012) Aziz v Lim [2012] EWHC 915 (QB) (05 April 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Rouse Tout A Tout, R (on the… [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:03 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Geary v JD Wetherspoon Plc [2011] EWHC 1506 (QB) (14 June 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Harris v Jones & Ors [2011] EWHC 1518 (Ch) (14 June 2011) Shetty v Al Rushaid Petroleum Investment Company & Ors [2011] EWHC 1460 (Ch) (09 June 2011) Future Publishing Ltd v The Edge Interactive Media Inc & Ors [2011] EWHC 1489 (Ch) (13 June 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) R, R (on the application… [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:17 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Minkin v Cawdery Kaye Fireman & Taylor [2011] EWHC 177 (QB) (07 February 2011) Royal Bank of Scotland Invoice Discounting Ltd & Anor v Manuel [2011] EWHC 174 (QB) (04 February 2011) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd [2011] EWHC 179 (QB) (07 February 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Clarke v Meadus [2011] EWHC 180 (Ch) (07 February 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Cala Homes (South) Ltd v… [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:55 pm
  Specifically, earlier this week he effectively reviewed the state of the law concerning enforcement of the recently enacted federal Sex Offender Registration Notification Act (SORNA) in US v. [read post]
2 Feb 2014, 6:24 am by Howard Friedman
A news release from Hawaii's Department of Attorney General reports that on Jan. 29 a state trial court judge upheld the constitutionality under both the state and federal constitutions of Hawaii's Marriage Equality Act of 2013:In his ruling from the bench, Judge Sakamoto noted the importance of marriage under the federal constitution, drawing an analogy to Loving v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:27 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Hall v Harris & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 671 (22 May 2012) Ryanair Holdings Plc v The Office of Fair Trading & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 643 (22 May 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Smeaton v Equifax Plc [2012] EWHC 2088 (QB) (11 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Aerostar Maintenance International Ltd & Anor v Wilson & Ors [2012] EWHC 1353 (Ch) (04 May 2012) High Court (Administrative… [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 1:00 am by INFORRM
On 13 July, Sir Anthony May, the President of the Queen’s Bench Division, and Mr Justice Blair handed down their judgment in R (Gaunt) v Ofcom. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 2:58 am
  The decision does not spell out what was ambiguous about the retainer agreement, but both the bench and the appeal court determined that this "engagement" letter was insufficient to spell out an attorney-client relationship.LATIN AMERICA FINANCE GROUP, INC. and WILLIAM VAN DIEPEN, Plaintiffs-Appellants, -v.- CARLOS PAREJA and PAREJA Y ASOCIADOS, Defendants-Appellees. 06-3888-cv UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 2008 U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 3:25 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (UK) Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 394 (16 April 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Abbs v Somerfield Plc [2010] EWHC 735 (QB) (13 April 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) March, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2010] EWHC 765 (Admin) (16 April 2010) Nestorova-Goremsandu v Secretary of State for… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:25 pm
At the risk of revealing the fact that I'm a prototypically ignorant American, I'll concede that I had to look up to make sure that I knew were Alberta was.See if you're as lame as I am:  Do you know whether Alberta touches any states in the Ninth Circuit? [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 6:21 am
Teesta Atul Setalvad v State of Gujarat may well be a test case to decide whether the State's eagerness for custodial interrogation of an accused has to be given primacy over the accused's civil liberties. [read post]