Search for: "BUSH v. US " Results 441 - 460 of 4,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2009, 11:55 am
Here is the abstract: This paper examines the Reconstruction-era case of United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioners have not demonstrated their status as condemnees for purposes of challenging the IDA's condemnation of the subject roads, which are owned by the Town and were previously discontinued pursuant to Highway Law § 207 (compare Matter of Sierra Club v Village of Painted Post, 26 NY3d 301, 310 [2015]; Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioners have not demonstrated their status as condemnees for purposes of challenging the IDA's condemnation of the subject roads, which are owned by the Town and were previously discontinued pursuant to Highway Law § 207 (compare Matter of Sierra Club v Village of Painted Post, 26 NY3d 301, 310 [2015]; Matter of Save the Pine Bush, Inc. v Common Council of City of Albany, 13 NY3d 297, 305 [2009]). [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Kramer v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
Porter v Shepherds Bush Housing Association [2008] EWCA Civ 196 is a Court of Appeal judgment on an appeal of an application for revival of tenancy where all the arrears were paid off on a breached suspended possession order. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 11:36 am
An issue that was as relevant to President Lincoln, for example, when he suspended habeas during the Civil War as it is to President Bush today.There are genuine risks that the fear of external attack will result in an unacceptable dimunition of critical constitutional rights. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 6:19 am
We express our dissatisfaction, but I think most of us realize it's the President's responsibility to get us through this. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 10:51 am by Robert Loeb, Emma Kohse
The Obama administration’s forbearance on asserting the state secrets privilege in Salim v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 2:13 pm by Joe Koncelik
  Its important to remember the the Supreme Court has already ruled that EPA cannot consider cost in selecting a standard (ATA v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 7:29 am by Tom Smith
Bush’s White House, which argued that race should not be a significant factor. [read post]
Military detention may be legitimate for those captured on an actual battlefield, as our supreme court recognised in Hamdi v Rumsfeld. [read post]