Search for: "Baker v. Cirs" Results 441 - 444 of 444
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
BANKRUPTCY APPROVAL IS NOT NECESSARY OR REQUIRED CONCERNING A DEBTOR'S SETTLEMENT OF AN ADVERSARY PROCEEDING INVOLVING A VIOLATION OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY.
24 Jul 2006, 1:17 pm
Baker, 876 F.2d 456 (5th Cir. 1989) one would be made to  believe that the Rule does not apply in these cases. [read post]
StayViolation.Com - http://www.stayviolation.com/
VIOLATIONS OF THE AUTOMATIC STAY IN A CHAPTER 13 REPRESENTS A PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION OF A DEBTOR THAT DOES NOT BELONG TO A TRUSTEE.
24 Jul 2006, 8:18 am
Baker, 876 F.2d 456 (5th Cir. 1989). [read post]
StayViolation.Com - http://www.stayviolation.com/
The Political Question Doctrine: In Violation of International Law? (Part 2)
12 Jun 2006, 4:54 am by Tobias Thienel
The leading case on the doctrine is Baker v. [read post]
The Core - http://corelaw.blogspot.com/
The Political Question Doctrine et al.: In Violation of International Law? (Part 1)
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am by Tobias Thienel
Greece and Germany), i.e. by customary international law which the state has no choice but to follow (this goes to the justification of the infringement).However, the doctrines applied in the American cases cited do not follow from public international law (see Baker v. [read post]
The Core - http://corelaw.blogspot.com/