Search for: "Barnes v State" Results 441 - 460 of 1,881
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2018, 3:55 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that the “centers seemed to have a strong supporter in Justice Anthony M. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 12:12 pm by Howard Bashman
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court questions California law requiring antiabortion centers to disclose that the state provides abortion services. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
City of Riviera Beach, Florida, United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Additional coverage of NIFLA, which will be argued tomorrow, comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Richard Wolf at USA Today and Andrew Chung at Reuters. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
United States The Hunton & Williams Privacy Blog has noted the United States recent statements publically blaming the Russian Government for implementing cyber-attacks on the American energy infrastructure. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 4:30 am by Edith Roberts
At Techdirt, Tim Cushing looks at this week’s argument in United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
The first was United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm by Mark Walsh
” It turns out the story by the Post’s Supreme Court correspondent, Robert Barnes, is a site-visit preview of one of Tuesday’s cases, Lozman v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Ellen Nakashima reports that the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 3:33 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks when erroneous applications of the U.S. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that although “[o]pponents of gerrymandering have won a historic string of victories in the courts recently,” “millions of voters will cast their ballots this fall in districts that judges have declared to be unconstitutional,” because “the justices have routinely told states found to be offenders that they do not have to immediately redraw the maps. [read post]