Search for: "Barrett v. Failing"
Results 441 - 460
of 666
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2020, 10:10 am
The panel majority also rejected Mckesson's argument that NAACP v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 1:17 pm
Indeed, in Burson v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
In Artis v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:06 am
Wolf v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:02 pm
Supreme Court’s 1932 decision in Smiley v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 11:30 am
In the Pennsylvania case, Trump v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The elected Arizona legislature (and Chief Justice John Roberts’s dissent), like the Rehnquist concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
The city fails that test, CSS argued. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Critics call the proposal “Court packing” to evoke FDR’s failed effort in the 1930s, although proponents insist that Republicans have effectively packed the Supreme Court and lower courts, so that SCOTUS expansion would be better termed “unpacking. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 4:13 am
Wainwright, Brown v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 2:06 pm
While an officer may well articulate a reasonable suspicion that a given vehicle is operating without a permit, the evidence here failed to support such a finding. (2) Under New York v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 1:16 pm
Yafai v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 12:25 pm
As the Supreme Court held in Bush v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:15 am
Today's episode features Smith v. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 4:14 pm
The case FCC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 1:21 pm
Walker, Barrett wrote an opinion for a unanimous three-judge panel reversing the sentence of a convicted sex offender for failing to register. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:50 am
In a post published yesterday, I explained why Amy Coney Barrett is unlikely to vote to strike down the entire Affordable Care Act in Texas v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:35 pm
Those super precedents, Barrett said, include Marbury v. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 6:05 am
In Barr v. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 12:31 pm
Conversely, Barrett authored an opinion coded as “liberal” in United States v. [read post]
