Search for: "Batchelder"
Results 441 - 460
of 489
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2007, 2:11 am
The Day Casebeer Madrid & Batchelder and Heller Ehrman lawyers face the very real prospect of individual sanctions -- and possible California State Bar discipline -- for their mistakes in a San Diego patent case. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 6:32 am
We’ve reached out to name partner James Batchelder (pictured). [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 2:32 am
Heller partner Stanley Young and Day Casebeer partner James Batchelder were among the outside counsel representing Qualcomm. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 8:41 pm
It reports the lead trial counsel (unnamed in the opinion) was Heller's Stanley Young, along with Day, Casebeer's James Batchelder. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 6:16 am
Qualcomm is represented by Day Casebeer, led by James Batchelder until April, when he was replaced as lead counsel on the case. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:35 am
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0287p.06 2007/07/30 Natl Sur Corp v. [read post]
5 Aug 2007, 5:17 am
Batchelder (Associate Professor of Law and Public Policy, New York University School of Law) has recently posted on SSRN her article entitled Taxing Privilege More Effectively: Replacing the Estate Tax with an Inheritance Tax. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 8:33 pm
There's myself, Mark Gergen (Texas), Joe Bankman (Stanford), Dan Shaviro (NYU), Lily Batchelder (NYU), Noel Cunningham (NYU), Darryl Jones (Stetson), Alan Auerbach (Berkeley), Chris Sanchirico (Penn), and many others -- everyone agrees that there's a case for reform. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
OpinionPub DateShort Title/District 07a0276p.06 2007/07/23 Warren v. [read post]
21 Jul 2007, 8:28 am
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 4:07 pm
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 8:29 am
Batchelder authored the opinion for the court. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 10:48 pm
According to Judge Batchelder, however: [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 4:34 pm
According to Judge Batchelder's opinion, the plaintiffs could not establish standing because they could not directly prove that they were subject to surveillance. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 5:00 am
Batchelder wrote: "The plaintiffs do not -- and because of the state secrets doctrine cannot -- produce any evidence that any of their communications have ever been intercepted by the NSA, under the TSP, without warrants. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 3:35 am
But ironically, Batchelder would look a whole lot better if Glenn were right. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 2:24 am
BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 10:11 am
"]One other small but potentially important point on standing: Judge Batchelder reasons (pp. 19, 21-22) that the injunction would not provide any relief to the plaintiffs and their overseas clients -- would not reasonably be thought to change their behavior -- because, in her view, even if the NSA were required to comply with FISA, it would undertake the same surveillance, only pursuant to a court order, even if the TSP program were enjoined. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 9:29 am
The Sixth Circuit's 2-1 majority decision, written by Judge Alice Batchelder, says that's not enough for the plaintiffs to have the right to sue the government over the program and sent the case back down to the district court for dismissal.By refraining from communications (i.e., the potentially harmful conduct), the plaintiffs have negated any possibility that the NSA will ever actually intercept their communications and thereby avoided the anticipated harm… [read post]
