Search for: "Bills v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 19,959
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2022, 6:03 am by Unknown
Title V of Division AA of the FY23 appropriations bill would provide for a registration exemption for small business mergers and acquisitions brokers by amending Exchange Act Section 15(b) to add a new subsection (13). [read post]
Johnson granted a temporary restraining order against state laws designed to take effect after Roe v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 10:03 pm by David M. McLain
This bill is an attempt to address a court decision, General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona v Mountain States Mutual Casualty Company 205 P.3D 529 (Colo. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 12:19 pm by Shannon O'Hare
This approach has been endorsed and adopted in the recent case National Bank of Kazakhstan and the Republic of Kazakhstan v Bank of New York Mellon, Anatolie Stati and others. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 12:24 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
” “Covered entities” as defined in the Toomey Bill do not include financial institutions subject to Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act or HIPAA-covered entities, which are exempt from the bill’s requirements. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 9:36 am by Administrator
And it is likely to drive international telecommunications and internet companies to European states which have introduced far less demanding regimes. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 2:53 pm
 Though maybe you'll get personally whacked with a $11+ million tax bill once the company files for bankruptcy and isn't able to pay the IRS.Ouch.Lesson for the day:  If you have anything whatsoever to do with a company, make sure you pay the IRS. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:04 am
Some years back they made quite a bit of law in a case called State Farm v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 7:35 am by JB
Gore is an example of what the Supreme Court and federal judges shouldn't do.If opponents of the bill are reduced to wishing for a second Bush v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 1:30 pm
Illinois’ and Vermont’s bills both recognize abortion and other reproductive rights as “fundamental,” ensuring that they will remain protected in those states, regardless of what happens to Roe v. [read post]