Search for: "Board of Education v. Commission on Civil Rights"
Results 441 - 460
of 518
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm
Electrical Services, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:51 am
How Donald Trump Set Off a Civil War Within the Right-Wing MediaNew York Times Magazine – Robert Draper | Published: 9/29/2016 The conservative media has always been a playground for outsize personalities with even more outsize political ambitions. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
Participation is by invitation only, but we encourage the ASLH community to chat with the Fellows about their projects throughout the conference.Johnson Fellows:Pedro Cantisano, Kenyon College (cantisano1@kenyon.edu) Rio de Janeiro on Trial: Law and Urban Reform in Modern BrazilMarie-Amélie George, Wake Forest University School of Law (georgemp@wfu.edu) Deviant Justice: The Transformation of Gay and Lesbian Rights in AmericaAmanda Laury Kleintop, Massachusetts… [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 10:10 am
Jan. 27, 2016); Bartnett v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm
” Contraception In 2007, in In Re: Union Pacific Railroad Employment Practices Litigation, Gruender wrote for a panel of the 8th Circuit reversing a district court ruling holding that the failure of the railroad to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives used solely to prevent pregnancy constituted sex discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:22 am
Shareholders would be given the right to a non-binding vote on executive compensation. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 6:24 am
Nor does it handle claims for injuries involving: Chicago Transit Authority (CTA), Chicago Park District, Chicago Board of Education, Metropolitan Water Reclamation District, Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority, Chicago Public Building Commission, Cook County and State of Illinois (IDOT). [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:34 am
Dicho reconocimiento ha probado ser positivo y efectivo dado que los estudiantes egresados de dichas instituciones han obtenido en muchas ocasiones los resultados más altos en la prueba del “College Board”. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm
The FLSA requires that covered, non-exempt employees be paid at least the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour for all hours worked, plus time and one-half their regular rates, including commissions, bonuses and incentive pay, for hours worked beyond 40 per week. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
Using or possessing a deadly weapon during the commission of any felony offense included in chapter 34 of this title; or 9. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am
”[19] This initiative is a step in the right direction, but nevertheless, the abovementioned raises a few legal questions: What is the legal status quo for stolen artifacts? [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
The Indian Civil Rights Act at Forty. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
The Indian Civil Rights Act at Forty. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
The Perpetrators also represented to the Migrants that if they “were willing to board airplanes to other states, they would receive employment, housing, educational opportunities, and other like assistance at their arrival. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
A board certified labor and e [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 3:00 am
All seven state ballot measures considered following the Supreme Court’s 2022 Dobbs v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:00 am
Fish & Game Commission (1997) 16 Cal.4th 105; Health First v. [read post]
