Search for: "Booker"
Results 441 - 460
of 3,241
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2007, 9:49 pm
Spears, the Eighth Circuit post-Booker crack ruling. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 6:12 am
I had thought that the Supreme Court's cert grants in Claiborne and Rita might slow post-Booker rulings, but all this action even during a short holiday week suggests otherwise: First circuit says acquitted conduct enhancements still fine Third Circuit karate chops the parsimony provision [update: and so does the Fourth Circuit] Sixth Circuit affirms above-guideline sentence in TSA case Rough holiday week for defendants in the Eighth Circuit Another ugly day in the Eighth… [read post]
30 May 2014, 7:19 am
Baraka and Booker are polar opposites. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:21 pm
This Note is entitled "Sentencing Organizations After Booker" and is available at this link. [read post]
21 Jun 2005, 6:27 pm
I would emphasize that the "newly recognized right" in question was more likely announced in Blakely than in Booker, so the year is more likely (under Dodd) to run from the date of Blakely than from the date of Booker next January. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 6:56 am
Booker’s lawyer had been investigating. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:23 pm
It is a welcomed door-opener and one which gives the fairest meaning to the mandate of Booker. [read post]
22 Aug 2006, 5:57 am
Recent circuit opinions have helped me see the one central flaw that infects reasonableness review after Booker. [read post]
11 May 2007, 9:17 am
Since no court ever decided that Booker was retroactive, this is not big news. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 10:49 am
Senate Judiciary Committee is considering two bipartisan legislative proposals focusing on the operation of “app stores” and requiring that large app stores allow for a competitive marketplace without the tight controls that we see today: S. 2992, American Innovation and Choice Online Act (Klobuchar, Grassley, Durbin, Graham, Blumenthal, Kennedy, Booker, Hirono, Hawley) S. 2710, Open App Markets Act (Blumenthal, Blackburn, Klobuchar, Booker, Graham, Kennedy, Hirono,… [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 9:23 am
The Ninth Circuit upheld an aggregate 50-year sentence imposed on a registered sex offender convicted of producing child pornography as reasonable under Booker. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
It will be interesting to see the result of the review, particularly in light of the recent Pacific Booker decision in the British Columbia Supreme Court where the Court was ordered the Environmental Assessment Office to reconsider its earlier rejection of Pacific Booker’s application to develop the Morrison deposit in British Columbia. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:42 am
It will be interesting to see the result of the review, particularly in light of the recent Pacific Booker decision in the British Columbia Supreme Court where the Court was ordered the Environmental Assessment Office to reconsider its earlier rejection of Pacific Booker’s application to develop the Morrison deposit in British Columbia. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 11:28 am
Santens's image in the tweet shows the same chart of the polls but cuts it off before the Booker and O'Rourke columns. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
Newark's mayor, Cory Booker, had been planing a run at it-- Lautenberg, who was 89, had already announced that he wouldn't run again. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:43 pm
Long-time readers with great long-term memories may recall an entertaining opinion written in the weeks after Booker by US District Judge Richard Kopf. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:47 am
But Justice Ginsburg's flip in Booker helped a distinct group of five justices water-down the impact of Blakely through the Booker remedy. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 11:16 am
So, adding up these pieces, what does this likely mean for the future of federal sentencing law and post-Booker jurisprudence? [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 8:37 am
Neither Booker nor section 3553(a) authorizes district court to reject 100:1 quantity ratio. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:19 pm
Jan. 18, 2006) Mui presents the unusual circumstance of an appeal from a sentence imposed post-Blakely but pre-Booker during a period of "considerable consternation and concern" in the federal courts as to the legality of judicial fact-finding under the Guidelines. [read post]
