Search for: "Brady v. Maryland" Results 441 - 460 of 775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2012, 8:10 am by Steve Hall
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 6:15 am by Cyrus Farivar
On Monday, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), the ACLU Maryland, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), the Center for Democracy and Technology, and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed an amicus brief in an appeal of the United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 12:22 pm by Kalvis Golde
Williamson County, Texas 21-186Issue: Whether the due process right recognized in Brady v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Leon Friedman
Brady, a divided Court held that a court must appoint a lawyer only if there are “special circumstances” requiring one. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:10 pm by Lyle Denniston
Maryland) to share with defense lawyers all of the evidence they had which might help the accused. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 8:47 am by Aurora Barnes
Maryland does not apply to impeachment evidence when the Supreme Court has held that Brady does apply to impeachment evidence. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 5:12 am by John Elwood
Maryland and Napue v. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 12:26 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
  Brady material gets its name from the landmark 1963 United States Supreme Court decision of Brady v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 8:54 am by John Elwood
Robinson, Warden (relisted after the 4/13 Conference) Docket: 11-8360 Issue(s):  (1) Whether the en banc Sixth Circuit correctly held that the Ohio courts did not unreasonably apply Brady v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 1:55 am
 The Court of Appeals is Virginia's intermediate appellate court (not to be confused with Maryland's Court of Appeals being that state's highest court). [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  The New Orleans office has not had a storied history with the Court in its compliance with the Court’s 1963 decision in Brady v. [read post]