Search for: "Brooks v. Powers"
Results 441 - 460
of 691
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2014, 6:55 am
And Wells linked to a District Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
See Wright v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
25 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
Wells previewed oral arguments before the DC Circuit in Abdullah v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 10:22 am
In Fritzsche v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:58 am
But all exercise power within certain boundaries. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
At one extreme, and still quite powerful, the law views the corporation as property in the hands of its equity owners. [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 4:46 pm
" Fox v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon… [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Other cases included: Mr Peter Light v Hounslow Chronicle, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; RMT Union v Evening Standard, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; A man v The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 3, 15/06/2012; A man v Irish News, Clause 3, 15/06/2012; Mr Martin Robbins v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mr Colin Cortbus v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 4, 15/06/2012; Mrs Caroline Panesar v Daily… [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
Thoratec Corp., 376 F.3d 163 (3d Cir. 2004); Brooks v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am
Dr Brooke Magnanti, better known by the name Belle de Jour, is reported to be suing her ex-boyfriend for libel on the grounds that he had suggested she might never have been a prostitute. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46) Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP) Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 1:34 pm
Brookings’ William McCants points out that, if confirmed, the attack could prompt serious backlash by Russian forces against the Islamic State. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 12:34 pm
The Trump administration has also curbed exports of civilian nuclear technology to China, citing concerns that China was employing the technology for military purposes such as nuclear-powered submarines or floating power reactors that could be deployed to support military installations in the South China Sea. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The amendments would also include allegations that senior executives at NGN, such as Rebekah Brooks, Rupert Murdoch and James Murdoch, were aware of the wrongdoing and sought to conceal evidence. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am
Thanks to Kevin Brooks for wading through the largest docket of the term to identify these cases. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(IPKat) CFI: CTM grant not contrary to Portuguese business name ruling: Alberto Jorge Moreira da Fonseca, Lda v OHIM, General Óptica, SA, intervening (Class 46) CFI confirms refusal of Anheuser-Busch’s BUDWEISER Community trade mark: Anheuser-Busch v OHIM - Budejovicky Budvar (Class 46) (IPKat) (Law360) (Out-Law) ACTA negotiation powers for EU Commission (BLOG@IP::JUR) EU sound recording term extension vote delayed (Excess Copyright) EP divisional… [read post]
