Search for: "Burger v. Judge"
Results 441 - 460
of 492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 May 2020, 1:07 pm
") The Court of Federal Claims is an Article I court: the judges serve for fifteen year terms, and there are no jury trials. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:16 am
” In late July, Sirica ordered Nixon to provide the tapes to the court so that he (Judge Sirica) could determine which, if any, of them Nixon could withhold from the grand jury on grounds of executive privilege. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 9:01 pm
Take Dothard v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:45 am
" Chaplinsky v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
For example, Chief Justice Warren Burger died nearly a quarter-century ago and his official biography has yet to be published. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:27 am
This case has nothing to do with burgers New to the handy linguistic tool, this Kat has been having a lot of fun using Google Translate this week. [read post]
30 Mar 2019, 2:28 pm
That being said, if your target audience is the Judge Judy-loving-daytime-television-watcher, stick with TV! [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 6:37 am
The paradigmatic case on the subject, Anderson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 3:17 pm
The beard in question belongs to one V. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 5:11 am
After a judicial clerkship with Judge James Hunter of the U.S. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 2:30 am
Terry v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 10:48 am
South Carolina (1992) and Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am
Stevens, then a judge on the U.S. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 2:49 am
Moreover, the broad scope thus given to the claim allows the judge to set aside the doctrine of equivalents at the stage of the assessment of infringement. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:01 am
Back then, the Ninth was in a bit of an existential crisis: it was staffed with liberal activist judges and had the dubious distinction of most-reversed circuit in the country, with 27 of 28 rulings that reached SCOTUS in ’84 overturned by the Burger court. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 2:00 pm
See Katzenbach v. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm
Whether verbatim copying from a public figure’s manuscript in a given case is or is not fair must be judged according to the traditional equities of fair use. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm
The first case is Mississippi v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm
Mr Speker cites the case of Economou v de Freitas, about which – as the trial judge – I should make no comment. [read post]
