Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT" Results 441 - 460 of 2,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2024, 2:24 pm by Brian Fong
Manageability Presently, under the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Estrada v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 10:17 am by Brian Fong
Manageability Presently, under the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in Estrada v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 1:55 pm by AALRR
AT& T Mobility LLC., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed with the conclusion of the court in Quevedo v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
A California federal court has denied a baking company’s motion to compel arbitration in a proposed class ‎action brought by independent baked goods distributors who have alleged wage and hour violations ‎under California state law. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:46 pm
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., California Supreme Courtstate-court expert admission standards·                     Gaston v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 10:46 am by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 10:00 am by Anthony Zaller
  The bill was held in committee by the Assembly Committee on Appropriations this week, and will not likely make it out of the Committee this year. 3)     California Supreme Court addresses arbitration agreements and what makes such agreements “unconscionable” and therefore unenforceable In a consumer case, the California Supreme Court ruled in Sanchez v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:38 pm by Tracy Scheidtmann
On May 29, 2019, the California State Assembly overwhelmingly passed AB 5, a bill seeking to codify Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:07 pm by Robert M. Jaworski
The Lower Courts’ Decisions The Complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
LITIGATION Two More Vanilla Cases Get Thrown Out of the Food Court In Robie v. [read post]
Extended Version:The 2016 FTC v AT&T Mobility decision at the 9th Circuit eliminated the Federal Trade Commission’s authority to enforce privacy rules on ISPs in Arizona, Alaska, Hawaii, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, and Washington. [read post]