Search for: "CITY OF PARK CITY, UTAH"
Results 441 - 460
of 547
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2009, 2:10 am
Summum that Pleasant Grove City, Utah need not acccept a "Seven Aphorisms" monument for a local park, it remanded to the lower courts for further consideration a more complicated companion case, Summum v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:05 am
Apparently the parties are close to agreement on access to parks, use of a cemetery and payment of outstanding bills. [read post]
6 May 2009, 2:40 am
Jason Chaffetz (Utah), the ranking Republican on a House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee that oversees the District. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
Utah political science professor Anthony A. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 12:30 am
According to AP, today in Salt Lake City, Utah, two days of meetings begin between all the parties to try to reach an agreement on how to finally deal with FLDS Church property owned by the United Effort Plan Trust. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
I found a nice blog posting about Great Basin National Park and the Aquifer here. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 5:19 pm
Perhaps the largest attraction is the Sundance Film Festival, hosted annually in Park City, Utah. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 6:19 am
Summum, holding that Pleasant Grove City, Utah need not acccept a "Seven Aphorisms" monument for a local park. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:56 am
The Court held unanimously that a Utah city park's acceptance of a permanent 10 Commandments monument did not, as a matter of free speech doctrine, obligate the city to accept a permanent monument commemorating the "Seven Aphorisms" of the Summum religion.As I noted in a FindLaw column when the Court granted certiorari last spring, this was the only result one could have reasonably expected, at least treated as a case involving speech issues alone. … [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 2:45 pm
Pioneer Park is in Pleasant Grove City Utah. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 12:33 pm
Guess who represented the Utah city before the Court? [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 7:18 am
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court ruled that a public park in Utah need not provide space for a religious monument reflecting the Summum religion. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 5:42 am
" In USA Today, Joan Biskupic has an article headlined "Justices: City can refuse monument; Utah park doesn't have to take marker from small religious sect. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:24 am
Now, Justice Samuel Alito Jr. has quoted at length from John Lennon.The reference appeared in Alito's major ruling in Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 2:04 am
Thus held the Supreme Court in Pleasant Grove City, Utah v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 5:45 pm
The Supreme Court answered a rather emphatic ‘yes’ to that question today in the case involving Summum, a Utah-based religious group that had tried to force Pleasant Grove City, Utah, to place a granite marker in a local park. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 2:25 pm
It's unanimous: Pleasant Grove City, Utah is not required to display a monument in a city park donated by "a tiny religious sect" -- even though the park displays a monument to the Ten Commandments, a religious symbol endorsed by a much larger religious sect. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:34 pm
" Summum's lawsuit was an attempt to force Pleasant Grove City, Utah, to erect a monument containing its "seven aphorisms" and be given equal space with other monuments in the park, including a monument of the ten commandments, monument to the Sept. 11 terror attacks, a stone from the first LDS temple in Nauvoo, a historic granary, and a wishing well. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:24 pm
Savage of The Los Angeles Times has a news update headlined "Religious group's monument does not fall under free speech; Utah city is not required to allow 'Seven Aphorisms' in park beside Ten Commandments, court rules. [read post]
