Search for: "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT v. US "
Results 441 - 460
of 7,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 10:22 am
In Donovan v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 12:38 pm
Supreme Court, Jan. 22, 2019, Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 4:01 am
” Amburgy v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 4:24 pm
The injunction, whilst refused by Bean J at first instance, had been granted by the Court of Appeal on the basis of the well-known but little used tort of Wilkinson v Downton, because the book could cause psychological harm to the applicant minor. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:20 pm
Jane wrote an amicus brief in IMS v. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 1:20 am
” Modis, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:01 pm
”The case cite is Watkins v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 4:19 am
On the issue of confidentiality in the SEP context, the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf stated, in the Sisvel v. [read post]
26 May 2012, 4:14 pm
The cleanest way to assert a claim for misappropriation or improper use of confidential information is to show a breach of some non-disclosure covenant. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 12:44 pm
In a case decided last week (Van Buren v. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 11:20 am
Counsel for the claimant pointed out that there had been no reference to Article 10 or s.12 in the key earlier Court of Appeal case Tchenguiz and Ors v Imerman (Rev 4) [2010] EWCA Civ 908 (29 July 2010) but the judge reckoned that the point about likely success at trial had been fully considered, even if the provisions had not been mentioned in so many words.The judge was satisfied that unless the defendants were restrained, the claimant would be able to show at trial that the… [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 11:20 am
Counsel for the claimant pointed out that there had been no reference to Article 10 or s.12 in the key earlier Court of Appeal case Tchenguiz and Ors v Imerman (Rev 4) [2010] EWCA Civ 908 (29 July 2010) but the judge reckoned that the point about likely success at trial had been fully considered, even if the provisions had not been mentioned in so many words.The judge was satisfied that unless the defendants were restrained, the claimant would be able to show at trial that the… [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 7:44 am
EIR 2004, regs 12(4)(e) (internal communications), (5)(d) (confidentiality), (5)(e) (commercial or industrial information).: Andrew Nicoll v IC EA/2010/0157. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 3:04 pm
Janus et Cie v. [read post]
11 May 2017, 7:30 am
By Charlie Warner A recently published decision of an Ohio Court of Appeals reminds us that, particularly in this electronic age, employers need to be very careful in the handling of confidential medical information. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:18 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 1:48 pm
We assume that the appeals court ruled this way because there was no evidence that Sinele had actually used or disclosed ADM confidential information. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 1:52 pm
Anecdotally, plaintiffs frequently file lawsuits alleging that their trade secrets were misappropriated, but courts determine that what the plaintiffs claimed were trade secrets were not because, either the information was publicly available or the plaintiff, itself, disclosed the information to the defendant or others without requiring that the defendant or others maintain the confidentiality of the information and not use it. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:11 am
U.S. v. [read post]
