Search for: "CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT, Section (C)"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2013, 6:05 am
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio 2013). [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 10:46 am
SEC: “whether, and to what extent, the SEC may seek ‘disgorgement’ in the first instance through its power to award ‘equitable relief’” in a federal district court action under Section 21(d)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:34 am
MENDEZ, Appellee. 3rd District. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 8:00 pm
Michigan, the Double Jeopardy Clause permits a district court to retract its “judgment of acquittal” entered on remand as an interpretation of the Court of Appeals’ mandate. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:57 am
The Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, has upheld a district court’s dismissal of criminal charges under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act that were predicated on misappropriation of proprietary documents in violation of the employer’s computer use policy. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 8:57 am
The Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, has upheld a district court’s dismissal of criminal charges under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act that were predicated on misappropriation of proprietary documents in violation of the employer’s computer use policy. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:36 pm
Both cases are pending in the Lawrence District Court. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:15 am
The petitioner’s record, which shall include, at a minimum, the petitioner’s mental health records and criminal history records, if any. c. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:45 pm
A court in the Northern District of California in Google LLC v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 5:13 pm
Robert C. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
Nonetheless, the district court honored the (c) deal and imposed a sentence at the high end of the deal's range: 48 months. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 6:56 am
The court applies the standard three-part test for a Section 230(c)(1) defense: 1) Facebook is an ICS provider (cites to Sikhs for Justice and Fraley). [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:33 pm
Section 271(c). [read post]
14 May 2021, 5:21 am
In this case Orifarm did in fact appeal the district court’s decision. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:03 am
U.S. (17-1134), were convicted of violations of Rule 10b-5(c) and took issue with the district court's instructions to the jury concerning materiality and the mens rea requirement for convictions under statutes requiring willfulness. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
Proc. 11(c)(1)(C). [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Justice Rebeca C. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 4:58 pm
Section 168-n of the Act places upon the sentencing court the duty to actually determine the risk level, following receipt of the Board's recommendation, thirty days prior to release. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:30 pm
The Court does not, under section 702, make a substantive finding about a particular target. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:18 am
c. [read post]
