Search for: "CROSS v. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA" Results 441 - 460 of 1,764
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2016, 6:08 am
District Court for the Southern District of California:  U.S. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:21 am by Jim Lennon
Patent litigants have long expected an appeal to follow nearly every jury verdict and that a key question (if not the key question) on appeal will be the district court’s construction of one or more disputed claim terms. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 5:04 am by Jon Hyman
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that a reasonable jury could conclude that Prieto’s hugs could create a sexually hostile work environment. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:22 pm by The Complex Litigator
(April 9, 2010), the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division One) reversed an Order dismissing a First Amended Cross-Complaint, after defendants demurred on the ground that cross-complainant did not file within the four-year limitations period applicable to the Unfair Competition Law ("UCL"). [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 10:39 pm by Florian Mueller
The Federal Circuit adopted Judge Posner's claim construction of this patent in Apple v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 11:18 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The appellate court rejected followed the Supreme Court’s recent decision in California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 1:30 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In the second part of its opinion, the Court affirmed the analysis of its prior decision in Valley Advocates v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:13 pm by William W. Abbott
While the ensuing appeal and cross-appeal involved additional CEQA claims, the only issue addressed by Appellate Court was that concerning the project description. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 4:40 pm by Brad Pauley
The Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One, held in a published opinion, Muldrow v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:08 pm by Jon Sands
  The defendant appealed his convictions and the government cross-appealed the sentence.A. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 10:42 am by Ilya Somin
Lower courts have ruled in favor of sanctuary jurisdictions in numerous cases based in part on Alito's opinion for the Court in Murphy v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:30 am
The California Court of Appeals opinion in People v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
Boskey (2000) 82 Cal.App.4th 171, 183-84.)The only case in California that came close to the issues presented in this appeal was Webb v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 7:11 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
Granted that the reasons for posting the crosses are probably noble and have universal appeal, but that doesn't excuse the fact that it's an explicitly religious symbol being used.Would that the message were clearer to certain members of the Supreme Court, who think that sometimes a cross can be divorced in meaning from its inherently religious symbolism. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Not according to a recent decision from the California Appellate Courts, Crane v R. [read post]