Search for: "Cable One, Inc."
Results 441 - 460
of 1,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
[5] IBIDDonald Erickson is the President of Erickson Partners, Inc. a valuation and advisory firm based in Dallas, Texas. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Google Inc., 2014 BCCA 295 http://t.co/AFoj7A5GnO -> Google ordered by BC court to block websites: Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 10:14 am
Aereo, Inc. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:37 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc. that a commission payment may be applied only to the pay period in which it is paid for the purposes of determining whether an employee is exempt from overtime. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 1:39 pm
One of those prongs calls for the moving party to demonstrate that it will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted. [read post]
20 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Trotum Systems Inc., 2014 ONSC 3863 http://t.co/GZ8qWsS7jQ -> corrupt anti social law http://t.co/aUi6IHIdTk -> Will Canada's New Anti-Spam Law Change Email and Social Marketing? [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:42 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc. that a commission payment may be applied only to the pay period in which it is paid for the purposes of determining whether an employee is exempt from overtime. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:42 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc. that a commission payment may be applied only to the pay period in which it is paid for the purposes of determining whether an employee is exempt from overtime. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 10:23 am
Time Warner Cable, Inc. that employees qualify for the California “commissioned employee” exemption in a pay period only if they receive “earnings [that] exceed one and one-half (1-1/2) times the minimum wage” in that two-week pay period. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:55 am
In re ActiveVideo Network, Inc., Serial No. 77967935 (July 9, 2014) [precedential].Applicant did not contest the examining attorney's contention that the term TV is generic for its goods and services, all of which involve streaming images to an electronic device having a screen. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 10:11 am
Aereo, Inc., 722 F. 3d 500 (2013)). [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:23 pm
Time Warner Cable Inc., issued a decision interpreting the first prong of the test: the compensation requirement. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
NAUTILUS, INC., D. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 9:26 am
Aereo, Inc., 2014 WL 2864485 (U.S. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 4:33 am
Allvoices, Inc., No. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:04 am
Virginia practitioners will know more about this topic in a few months, when the Supreme Court of Virginia decides Yelp, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 7:13 am
It would require the making of a new rule in analogy to existing ones. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:38 am
” The Court rejects Aereo’s position that the technology it deployed should be determinative—Aereo accomplishes the same thing cable companies, which clearly perform to the public, do, so why should it matter whether it does so “via a large multisubscriber antenna or one small dedicated antenna? [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 12:11 pm
In the end the final word was the Supreme Court's.For the uninitiated, the American Broadcasting Companies Inc v Aereo Inc case dealt with the web-based service Aereo, which offered, for a subscription fee, the streaming, recording and live watching of TV programming. [read post]
