Search for: "California Employment Law Letter"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,210
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2010, 12:16 am
Yuen, proceeding pro se wrote a letter in the case stating that the Northern District of California was an inconvenient forum. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 5:30 pm
It is also important to note that Amendment 64 does not change existing laws regarding driving under the influence of marijuana, and it allows employers to maintain all of their current employment and drug-testing policies. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:17 pm
For more information about compliance with California law, read the DLSE’s April 7, 2010 opinion letter (PDF). [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 11:22 am
California’s Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) also sets forth law regarding California’s wage and hour requirements. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 12:43 pm
While this could include any case in which the City or its employees are sued, typical cases include the dangerous condition of public property, state and federal civil rights laws, including claims of false arrest and excessive force, employment law, municipal law, constitutional law, City contracts, and public health law. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:06 am
Employers looking to use AI in their organization should remember that using AI tools does not exempt employers from state and federal labor laws. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 am
And a few Ivy League law students recently had job offers rescinded after they signed an open letter supporting Hamas. [read post]
20 May 2010, 2:40 pm
Under California law, however, non-competes are unenforceable except in very limited circumstances. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 1:45 pm
Read the letter to the judiciary committee chairs on increasing Californians’ access to legal services. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 2:42 am
— via Employment Law Matters DOL Issues Opinion Letter Allowing Employers to Avoid Payment for Excessive 15-Minute FMLA Breaks; Employers Yawn — via Jeff Nowak’s FMLA Insights Labor Democrats love unions. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:24 pm
Employers navigate a morass of federal and state employment laws on a daily basis. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 3:39 pm
Additionally, California employers should be mindful that if signed into law, the California DFEH will oversee the pay data collection—as opposed to the agency responsible for enforcing the California EPA (the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (“DLSE”)). [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 1:47 pm
Jerry Brown would have allowed employers to discriminate against employees who declined to obtain an EDL. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 12:07 pm
The state of California is free to repeal any civil service laws or other protections it may have for government employment; the Constitution isn’t implicated. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 12:13 pm
Our readers have requested that we post the full text of the California e bike law that was signed into law in October 2015 that governs the use of e bike on California roadways and some bike paths. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
(Court of Appeal decision discussed here.)On review, the California Supreme Court held as follows: Federal PreemptionThe federal Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) does not preempt the FEHA generally, nor does it preempt California's Senate Bill No. 1818, which provides in part: All protections, rights, and remedies available under state law, except any reinstatement remedy prohibited by federal law, are available to all individuals… [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:43 pm
” Analysis of the Non-Solicitation Provision In reaching its conclusion, the Court cited California case law rejecting employee non-competes and “overbroad” customer non-solicitation provisions. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 3:07 pm
On April 7, 2010, the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) issued an opinion letter addressing the requirements employers must meet in order to have unpaid interns in compliance with California law. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 9:42 pm
Rather, the Supreme Court favored the trial court's procedure - contact information would be disclosed unless the putative class member objected to the disclosure by returning the letter sent by the parties, checking a box denying consent to disclosure.The Pioneer case is not an employment law decision per se; the case involved claims that a Pioneer DVD player was defective. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:25 pm
California Emergency Physicians Medical Group, that a “no re-hire” provision in a settlement agreement could constitute a restraint of trade in violation of California law. [read post]
