Search for: "California v. Austin" Results 441 - 460 of 636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am by Florian Mueller
In the United States, SK hynix is represented by Sidley Austin against Netlist. [read post]
26 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Series of Essays
May, President of the Free State Foundation In West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:05 am by Susan Brenner
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), which held that obscene material is not protected by the 1st Amendment. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Rev __ (2018 Forthcoming), Eumi Lee, University of California Hastings College of the Law. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by SHG
So what happens when some collector car (say, a 1964 Austin Healey 3000 Mark III, Series II, BJ8) gets smashed? [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 4:34 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Bower, director de Educación Judicial de The Williams Institute de la Escuela de Derecho de la Universidad de California en Los Ángeles (UCLA); el psiquiatra José Franceschini Carlo; la licenciada Alexandra Rodríguez Espinoza; el doctor William Austin, psicólogo clínico forense; el Hon. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
  Here are some panels that may be of interest to readers:YOUNGBLOOD: YOUTH, RACE, AND THE STRUGGLE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS PRESIDING: Prudence Cumberbatch, Brooklyn College The Racial and Sexual Politics of Space: Youth and Interracial Mixing in New Orleans, Lakisha Michelle Simmons, Davidson College  More than a Hamburger and a Cup of Coffee: NAACP Youth and the Black Freedom Movement, Thomas Bynum, Middle Tennessee State University  Blackboard Jungle: Desegregation, Delinquency, and… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 10:02 pm by Dan Flynn
District Court for Northern California, which is how the case on appeal went to the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under… [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 6:33 am by Hans von Spakovsky
  The Court left that question unanswered in 2009, when it decided Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 3:37 am by SHG
But I complacently assumed that wouldn’t affect me directly, least of all in Austin. [read post]