Search for: "California v. Marks"
Results 441 - 460
of 4,361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2024, 6:39 am
(This word mark needs to be busted, and pronto. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 7:57 pm
Center for Biological Diversity v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
In Pragmatus AV, LLC v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day, Guessous v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:55 am
Here are excerpts: From the introduction: In 1979, following Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 9:00 am
This was the issue in Burgueno v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:08 pm
This is also consistent with the California Supreme Court’s holding in Ross v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
In Mission Viejo Emergency Medical Associates v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:56 pm
Today, it's FCC v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 9:31 am
” Id. at 6 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 5:00 pm
In Mark v. [read post]
Uncertain Boundary Line and Missing Monuments - Some Rules For How You Locate the Line in California
14 Aug 2014, 8:05 am
In Jacques Bloxham v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:17 pm
”) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). [read post]
4 May 2012, 2:00 am
This was an issue in Parker v. [read post]
29 May 2006, 2:24 am
Department of Parks and Recreation v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 3:46 am
The Plimsouls v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 4:36 pm
On February 27, the Eastern District of California denied cross-motions for summary judgment on Nike’s dilution claim in Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:57 am
“Recent, marked improvement in academic performance.” [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 11:57 am
“Recent, marked improvement in academic performance. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
Morales The inspiration for the bill that is currently being considered in California is the case of People v. [read post]
