Search for: "California v. Russell" Results 441 - 460 of 750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2010, 4:41 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Rosenberg of The McCormack Firm in his Boston ERISA & Insurance Litigation Blog Don't Be Blindsided with an Overtime Audit Due to Misclassifying Independent Contractors - New York lawyer Laura Himelstein of Greenwald Doherty on the firm's blog, Overtime Advisor Reed Elsevier v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 4:44 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- LEED AP Chris Cheatham of Crowell Moring on his blog, Green Building Law Update Waiting for Ruling to Ya'll Politics' Motion To Unseal in State Farm v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Vaudreuil of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore on the firm’s California Public Agency Labor & Employment Blog Lesser Known Exemptions: The “Ministerial” Exception to the FLSA - Chicago lawyer Doug Hass of Franczek Radelet on his blog, Wage & Hour Insights Startups and Small Businesses: Picking your Business Team – Pennsylvania attorney Matthew Landis of Russell, Krafft & Gruber on the firm’s Lancaster Law Blog Alabama Seeks To Become 48th State To… [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:44 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 8:05 am by John Elwood
California Coastal Commission. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
Opinion below (1st Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Cases involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 08-1403 Title: Daniels v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
” At AlterNet, Bill Blum worries that “[t]he limited fealty Roberts has demonstrated to the ACA in the past makes it impossible to accurately forecast how he will approach his task” next term in California v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:29 am by John Elwood
Meanwhile, on a stud farm somewhere in Kentucky, all the horses are tired of hearing the old blowhard going on about how things would have been different if he’d just been named California Chroam. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 7:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
***As I often do, I checked out Russell Beck's Fair Competition Law and learned Pennsylvania legislators have proposed a California-style ban on non-competes. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm by Kali Borkoski
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:57 am
The Webster brief to which my article referred, however, was not the brief submitted by Dawn Johnsen but was an entirely different brief.The footnote in question, note 24 on p. 484, cites a brief in Webster, filed by the California National Organization of Women and other organizations, and notes that this is an updated and revised version of a similar brief filed by California NOW in Roe v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 8:01 am by Amy Howe
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Hungary v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am by Kate Howard
California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:19 am by John Elwood
California Coastal Commission. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am by John Ehrett
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 11:31 am by Amy Howe
Regents of the University of California, Trump v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
On 13 and 14 November 2018 Supreme Court heard the appeal in the crucial “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print Limited. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
  Jay J granted summary judgment to the claimants, Russell Brand and Jemima Goldsmith. [read post]