Search for: "Callahan V Cir*"
Results 441 - 460
of 528
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2009, 3:06 am
Callahan which, despite it being a civil case, also has important ramifications for 4th Amendment law. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:30 am
Supreme Court, January 21, 2009 Locke v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 11:19 am
Supreme Court, January 21, 2009 Waddington v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:54 pm
www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/08pdf/07-751.pdf Waddington v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 11:26 am
Callahan, the Supreme Court listed a familiar set of justifications for overruling Saucier v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 7:24 am
Callahan and discarded the rigid two-step process for analyzing a qualified immunity defense that it had developed in Saucier v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 2:01 pm
Imagine a circuit court publishes a decision holding A and B, where both holdings A and B are considered necessary to the court's outcome. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 9:44 am
Callahan- 9-0, giving district courts discretion to disregard Saucier v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
Callahan (07-751) that the Saucier formula “should no longer be regarded as mandatory in all cases. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:21 pm
Basically, Judge Callahan dissents from the denial in this death penalty case, and begins her dissent by noting that the underlying opinion was the third time the panel in the case had reversed the death sentence. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:52 am
Callahan, 07-751] whether to change this order of consideration of immunity case issues. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, decided Sarei v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 10:59 pm
Two (Bea, joined by Callahan) concur. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:11 am
Gordon v. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
When it heard oral argument in Pearson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:44 pm
The United States Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in Pearson v Callahan, Supreme Court No. 07-751, which could greatly expand the authority of the police to search an individual’s home. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 7:55 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [day call] Monday in three cases, including Pearson v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
Callahan, 872 P.2d 487, 494 (Utah App. 1994) (trade secret is a property right) with ConFold Pacific, Inc. v. [read post]
