Search for: "Canon, Inc."
Results 441 - 460
of 664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2012, 1:56 pm
Supermarkets, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
First, under generally applicable canons of statutory construction, what impact does the mandatory provision have on the application of traditional equity principles of fiduciary duty in resolving claims brought against LLC managers? [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm
WIPIP/HoustonMy apologies—I was a bit sick so I missed some of the discussion.Mary LaFrance, Distinctly Personal: Trademarks in Individual NamesFight over registration of Cab Calloway’s name by competing groups of descendants. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
Canon USA et al. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
Canon USA et al. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:24 am
Defendants are further confusing consumers into thinking that the catalog is legitimate by sending unsolicited notices designed to make it appear as though USA Trademark Enterprises, Inc. is an official government enterprise or otherwise affiliated with any entity associated with the trademark registration process. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 6:49 pm
On January 23, 2012, Canon Inc. of Japan, Canon U.S.A., Inc. of Lake Success, New York, and Canon Virginia, Inc. of Newport News, Virginia (“CVI”) (collectively, “Canon”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 11:04 am
Can Kodak make money on its printers and presses when competition in the marketplace from Epson, Canon, and Hewlett Packard is already fierce? [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
Information for Industry, Inc. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:20 am
Canon Business Solutions, Inc., S184929, 185 Cal.App.4th 1159. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:11 pm
Group, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm
Kagan because of her rah-rah interest while part of Obama’s White House and Thomas because of his Liberty Central Inc. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm
By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* [Cross-posted at OpinioJuris] Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
by Marty Lederman By Marty Lederman and Steve Vladeck* Section 1021 of the NDAA and the Laws of War In our companion post, we explained that section 1021 of the NDAA will not have the dramatic effects that many critics have predicted–in particular, that it will not affect the unresolved question of whether the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) would authorize a future President to place a U.S citizen or resident who is apprehended in the United States in long-term military… [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 10:03 pm
Davidson, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 12:27 am
Canon Edward A. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 1:48 am
., LTD. 4518 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 3086 CANON KABUSHIKI KAISHA 2551 PANASONIC CORPORATION 2443 TOSHIBA CORPORATION 2212 SONY CORPORATION 2130 INTEL CORPORATION 1652 LG ELECTRONICS INC. 1488 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY 1222 Fuente: http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/topo_10.htm Granted patents per technical field Field of technology 2009 2010 Chemistry Food chemistry 457 448 … [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
[The Presbytery] will not assume any of [Timberridge Presbyterian Church, Inc. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:06 pm
Therefore, the recordation of the 2000 Notice could not have created a trust over the property.For the aforementioned reasons, we hold that title to the property at issue is held by All Saints Parish, Waccamaw, Inc., the Dennis Canons had no legal effect on the title to the congregation’s property, and the 2000 Notice should be removed from the Georgetown County records. [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 9:51 am
[Note: in this opening post on the recent Georgia cases, I begin with the case involving the Presbyterian Church (Timberridge), because it is the pivot on which the Court's decision in the Christ Church Savannah case turns. [read post]
