Search for: "Case v. People" Results 441 - 460 of 52,377
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2009, 10:32 am
Much less do you see this in a case involving multiple murders and no involvement with men.But here you go.Not someone you want to have as your former janitor. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 12:10 pm
 It was essentially random which count people like Mr. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:37 pm
  Didn't matter to the result, but it was interesting to see that matter addressed by individuals (and I include myself in this category) more familiar with legal doctrine than with the intricacies of how shotgun pellets work.The issue arose because "In the morning after the People rested its case, but before Chen began his, the People sought to reopen to clear up a point of potential confusion. [read post]
Summary This case relates to a point of statutory construction in the Representation of the People Act 1983, s 90C(1)(a). [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 10:27 am by Madelaine Lane
Pittao, Case No. 142052 and People v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 5:14 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
On August 26, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court published its opinion in People v. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 2:00 pm
 “People with this syndrome always feel hungry; no matter what they eat they are never full. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 11:48 am
As, indeed, is the case here.I might add, however, that it may be a bit easier than for the Court to reverse the death sentence here -- as contrasted to a typical case -- because the defendant has been sentenced to death twice, before two different juries. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
This is the first in a series of posts on United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 2:45 am by Jason Poblete
Although Pope-bashing by pundits on his recent trip to Cuba may have generated web traffic for the chattering class and headlines for the politicians, its time to move on to more constructive commentary on U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:51 am by ambimb
This news is already everywhere, but in case you haven’t heard, the SCOTUS held yesterday in Padilla v. [read post]