Search for: "Century v. Fitness" Results 441 - 460 of 1,236
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2019, 7:29 am by Andrew Hamm
Considering the stakes involved, I wanted to start with some fireworks and this scene definitely fit the bill. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
”  Ivan Preston argues that current puffery doctrine is a mistaken evolution from nineteenth-century cases involving individual buyers and sellers that held that buyers couldn’t sue for fraud based on statements that they could easily have verified or disproved themselves. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:04 pm by Adam Levitin
Professor Peter Conti-Brown of the Wharton School has written a short article for Brookings decrying the Second Circuit’s 2015 Madden v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:47 pm
This is in large part because the concepts of “copying”, “exclusivity” and “property”, as we know them today, did not resonate with the way that “news” was fined then, nor did they fit the aim of news publishing industry during the 18thand 19th century. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 3:26 pm
Technetix B.V. v Teleste Limited".OtherThe AmeriKat provides another FRANDly update, covering HTC v Ericsson, European Parliament SEP analysis, and more! [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:29 am by Peter Margulies
Admittedly, the government asked a citizenship question on the census for well over a century. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 1:20 pm
The success (or lack thereof) of the filed applications is reviewed.The patent drawing requirements, and their fitness for purpose were discussed in another post by GuestKat Rose Hughes. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
At the University of Chicago where Leiter works, for example, a course on “Jurisprudence” (the philosophy of law) was amongst the small group of courses offered in the year the university’s law school opened more than a century ago. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:41 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Most notably and most recently, the California Supreme Court ruled for the defense in O’Neil v. [read post]