Search for: "Charter Communications Inc"
Results 441 - 460
of 644
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(IP Dragon) Patent strategies for foreign R&D work in China (Philip Brooks' Patent Infringement Updates) All clichés but still true: Intellectual Property Rights enforcement in China leaves room for improvement (IP Dragon) Recognition and protection of well-known trade marks (International Law Office) Revised Chinese patent law aims at quality, compulsory licensing (Intellectual Property Watch) Zen and the art of intellectual property in China (IP Dragon) Colombia… [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 pm
(relisted after the June 16 and June 23 Conferences) Visa, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:24 am
City of Roswell 13-975Issue: Whether a document from a state or local government stating that an application has been denied, but providing no reasons whatsoever for the denial, can satisfy the Communications Act's “in writing” requirement. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 2:23 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 8:30 pm
National/Federal Barr Taps Durham as Special Counsel, Pushing Probe into Biden Era Politico – Kyle Cheney and Josh Gerstein | Published: 12/1/2020 Attorney General William Barr appointed U.S. attorney John Durham as a special counsel to investigate the origins of the FBI’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 election. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:09 am
At The Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:42 pm
See Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 7:09 am
Prolmo Inc., 2013 PR App. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 6:04 am
Go-Shops Revisited Posted by Guhan Subramanian (Harvard Business School) and Annie Zhao (Harvard Business School), on Friday, February 22, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Bidders, Conflicts of interest, Deal protection, Go-shop, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Private equity, Shareholder value, Termination fees A Capitalist’s Solution to the Problem of Excessive Buybacks Posted by Nell Minow, ValueEdge Advisors, on Friday,… [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 6:17 am
Simpkins, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, on Saturday, September 14, 2019 Tags: Board composition, Boards of Directors, Capital structure, Climate change, Disclosure, Diversity, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 6:16 am
Chuff, Pepper Hamilton LLP, on Sunday, August 4, 2019 Tags: Board communication, Charter & bylaws, Corporate forms, Delaware law, DGCL, Partnerships, Safe harbor Director Overboarding: Global Trends, Definitions, and Impact Posted by Kosmas Papadopoulos, ISS Analytics, on Monday, August 5, 2019 Tags: Board dynamics, Board performance, Boards of Directors, Diversity, Institutional… [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Settlement privilege extends beyond documents and communications expressly designated to be “without prejudice”. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Civil Procedure: Third Party Discovery OrdersRogers Communications Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 11:25 am
; Shelanu Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2021, 8:24 am
Many institutions, notably, have leveraged emerging technologies, including from institutions working with new types of bank charters designed to support such innovation. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:16 pm
For an example, some critics of former Chief Judge Randall Rader, who disparaged the PTAB as patent "death squads," acknowledged that his rulings on patent infringement damages provided some important clarifications beneficial to defendants.Two documents that have recently been filed with the Supreme Court of the United States argue that various Federal Circuit rulings in recent years have gutted the apportionment requirement for patent damages claims:On August 15, Time Warner Cable (which… [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 8:47 am
Without a comment, the Court denied review of Stormans, Inc. v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 4:48 pm
The Supreme Court has not followed his advice – rejection of the appeal in cassation against Google Inc. [read post]
