Search for: "Childs v. Johnson"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm
A criminal defendant may commit the offense of Endangering the Welfare of a Child through a single act or through multiple acts over a period of time (see People v Keindl, 68 NY2d 410, 421 [1986]). [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
A defendant need not commit an affirmative act directed at a child (see People v Hitchcock, 98 NY2d 586, 591 [2002]; People v Johnson, 95 NY2d 368, 371-372 [2002]) nor cause actual harm to a child (see Johnson, 95 NY2d at 371; see also People v Duenas, 190 Misc 2d 801 [App Term, 2d Dept 2002]) to be guilty of Endangering the Welfare of a Child. [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:53 pm
A defendant need not commit an affirmative act directed at a child (see People v Hitchcock, 98 NY2d 586, 591 [2002]; People v Johnson, 95 NY2d 368, 371-372 [2002]) nor cause actual harm to a child (see Johnson, 95 NY2d at 371; see also People v Duenas, 190 Misc 2d 801 [App Term, 2d Dept 2002]) to be guilty of Endangering the Welfare of a Child. [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
The criminal defendant, Phillip Johnson, is charged with Endangering the Welfare of a Child, Penal Law ["PL"] 260.10(1). [read post]
24 May 2015, 3:22 pm
The criminal defendant, Phillip Johnson, is charged with Endangering the Welfare of a Child, Penal Law ["PL"] 260.10(1). [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:54 pm
We reiterate, however, that each case is fact specific (see, People v West, 271 AD2d 806; People v Brooks, 270 AD2d 206, lv denied 95 NY2d 794; People v Parr, 155 AD2d 945, lv denied 75 NY2d 870 [all holding that a defendant who performs a significant act of domestic violence against a mother in the presence of a child is guilty of endangering the welfare of that child]). [95 N.Y.2d 374] With respect to defendant's appeal, the issues presented… [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:49 pm
" Actual harm to the child need not result for criminal liability; it is "sufficient that the defendant act in a manner which is likely to result in harm to the child, knowing of the likelihood of such harm coming to the child" (People v Simmons, 92 NY2d 829, 830 [emphasis added]). [read post]
20 May 2015, 1:58 pm
THEODORE JOHNSON, Appellant-Respondent. [read post]
15 May 2015, 2:45 pm
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court has affirmed judgement for a family awarded a total of $63 million in damages - including $13 million for loss of consortium -- following a child's severe reaction to multiple doses of Children's Motrin. [read post]
14 May 2015, 7:04 pm
Earlier this year in Yates v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
5 May 2015, 8:27 am
Johnson & Johnson (SJC-11677). [read post]
4 May 2015, 7:28 am
The case of Reckis v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:00 am
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
Johnson & Johnson, 471 Mass. 272, 2015 Mass. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:12 am
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
Graham v. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 8:45 am
Graham v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:47 pm
In the case of Reckis v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:24 pm
Johnson & Johnson (SJC-11677). [read post]
