Search for: "Commissioner v. Brown" Results 441 - 460 of 581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am by Peter Rost
Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, would be sending a letter of recommendation for Rost as well as several other candidates for the post. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 16 – 19 May 2011. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:59 pm by Blog Editorial
Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 16 – 19 May 2011. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am by Mathew Purchase, Matrix.
Some details can be found in the judgments of Lord Dyson at paragraphs 7-11 and Lord Brown at paragraphs 127-131. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:42 am by Kara OBrien
In the April 20 Letter and in a letter to Mayer Brown LLP dated April 7, 2011 (the “April 7 Letter”), the FPPC addresses issues related to the implementation of the following two exemptions: Employees, officers, or directors of an investment adviser are not placement agents required to register as lobbyists if all of the following apply: (1) the investment adviser is registered as an investment adviser under federal or state law, (2) the investment adviser has been selected… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:09 pm
Commissioner of Social Security New York Social Security Ruling Underscores Importance of Treating Physician Testimony: Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Famous examples are R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Ex p Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 , R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 AC 410 and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Blog Editorial
In Courtroom 1, Gale and another v Serious Organised Crime Agency is to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Judge, Clarke, Dyson and Reed. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:07 am by Rosalind English
R (on the application of GC) (FC) (Appellant) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis – read judgment A declaration has been granted by a majority in the Supreme Court that police policy of DNA retention is unlawful because it is incompatible with article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm by Blog Editorial
The following six appeals from Trinidad and Tobago will be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Dyson from Tuesday 17 May 2011 – Thursday 19 May 2011 in the Privy Council: Winston Gibson v Public Service Commission; Ranjan Rampersad v Commissioner of Police and Police Service Commission; Robert Ramsahai v Teaching Service Commission; Ashford Sankar & Others v Public Service Commission; Gopichand Ganga and Others… [read post]
12 May 2011, 5:54 am by INFORRM
In Browne v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2008] QB 103 at para 61), the Court considered the impact of “information which is made available to a person’s circle of friends or work colleagues and information which is widely published in a newspaper”. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:53 pm by Michael Geist
The Supreme Court of Canada is examining this issue within the context of libel in the Crookes v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:03 am by Blog Editorial
There are two appeals in the Privy Council this week to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Mance, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]
4 May 2011, 2:44 pm by scanner1
GRANITE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SUZANNE BROWNING, MAUREEN CONNOR and CLIFF NELSON, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:31 am by INFORRM
In Scotland a defamation claim by the former captain of the Scottish women’s curling team, Gail Munro, against the former coach, Derek Brown was tried. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 11:21 am
It also ruled that the ALJ overly relied on his own observations of Brown during a hearing - noting that Brown "sat and squirmed" during the hearing, for example - and on Brown's ability to perform basic daily activities. [read post]