Search for: "Commonwealth v. Grant, R."
Results 441 - 460
of 686
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2012, 7:01 am
The injured worker in Krushauskas v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 1:13 pm
” [HL Pulse summary] On April 19, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia granted expedited appeal in Gresham v. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
COMMONWEALTH v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:13 am
Comm’r of Correction, No. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
Wecht (D) won the Superior Court race and Covey (R) won the Commonwealth Court race. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:09 am
In another statutory violation case, B&R Resources v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
C.S.A. 5930, in the case of Davis v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 5:46 am
Poswistilo, Judge Terrence R. [read post]
9 May 2016, 5:45 am
To the extent the State relies on Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 6:00 pm
" COUNTY OF BUTLER, et al, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 6:25 am
In Cruz v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
Chelak of the Pike County Court of Common Pleas utilized the "trivial defect doctrine" to grant summary judgment in favor of a gas station owner in Melchiorre v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 6:20 am
While the Commonwealth Court repeatedly upheld the doctrine to dismiss suits by plaintiffs in the cases of Cochrane v. [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 2:35 pm
The Commonwealth of Kentucky filed a petition for certiorari, which the Court granted with regard to the exigent circumstances question. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Tyler v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 5:00 am
Section 8371.The Supreme Court adopted the two-part test enunciated in the case of Terletsky v. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:28 am
Under the doctrine of in pari delicto, “no court should be required to serve as paymaster of the wages of crime” (McConnell v Commonwealth Pictures Corp., 7 NY2d 465, 469 [1960] [citation omitted]). [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 6:45 am
R. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 8:00 am
Similarly, in DeVita v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm
Maybe not having the right to do so… Surely by now you have heard of the landmark decision, Goodridge v. [read post]
