Search for: "Coney v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 785
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2021, 8:04 pm by David Oscar Markus
The justices have wrestled with the question of spiritual advisers at executions for two and a half years, but Tuesday’s oral argument in Ramirez v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 1:46 pm by Amy Howe
The justices have wrestled with the question of spiritual advisers at executions for two and a half years, but Tuesday’s oral argument in Ramirez v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 9:38 am by Tom Smith
In July, Kavanaugh and Barrett joined the court’s leftist majority in declining to hear Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:59 pm by Amy Howe
But beyond a reference to the board’s “extremely checkered history,” there was little discussion of this drama at Tuesday’s oral argument in Houston Community College System v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 7:04 am by Josh Blackman
Regrettably, Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett have succumbed to judicial supremacy. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 8:40 pm by Ilya Somin
In addition to considering  Whole Woman's Health, the justices today also heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 9:39 am by Mary Ziegler
ShareMary Ziegler is a law professor at Florida State University and the author of Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 2:58 pm by Howard M. Wasserman
United States as amicus curiae Jonathan Ellis, assistant to the solicitor general, argued for the United States in support of Thompson. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat and Dennis Aftergut
” That characterization ignored the ruling’s profound real-world effect, preventing 85%-90% of women from exercising their rights under Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 3:01 pm by Shaakirrah Sanders
Thomas and Justice Amy Coney Barrett highlighted the abuse-of-discretion standard in People v. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 10:43 am by Robert Loeb, Cesar Lopez-Morales
On Oct. 6, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the first one, United States v. [read post]