Search for: "Cooper v. Smith"
Results 441 - 460
of 740
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2013, 10:06 am
Media Narratives about Female on Male Statutory Rape (co-authors Emily Danker-Feldman, Brenda Smith, and Andrea Smith) Moderator/Discussant: Frank Cooper Criminal Justice 14 and CRN Feminist Legal Theory group: Vulnerability and Criminal Law Fri. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am
Cooper, 16-166, meanwhile, was relisted yet again. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 9:35 am
Supreme Court's 1996 Romer v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 10:25 am
., Coopers & Lybrand v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 9:26 am
The impact of a Patentee’s participation in the pilot program was recently considered in Brass Smith LLC v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Smith, and if so, whether the Supreme Court should overrule Smith. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
In a separate opinion respecting the denial of certiorari in Smith v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 10:08 am
The court began by distinguishing a 1968 precedent, Smith v. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 9:54 pm
In today’s case (Cooper v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 5:24 am
I was discussing the Fourth Circuit case of Porter v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
The Court may be holding it for Smith v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
The Court may be holding it for Smith v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
Arizona for a police officer to seek to persuade an individual in custody to cooperate, after the individual has been told of his rights but neither invoked nor waived those rights. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 9:18 am
Smith and Espinoza v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:38 pm
Smith Docket: 10-1115 Issue: Did the Ninth Circuit exceed its authority under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am
HemCon, Inc (Patents Post-Grant) (Patently-O) (Reexamination Alert) (IPBiz) CAFC: Construing claim constructions: Cordis Corporation v Boston Scientific (Patently-O) (IPBiz) Kimberly-Clark: CAFC loses an opportunity to address law of preliminary injunctions: Kimberly Clark v First Quality Baby Products (IPBiz) The Federal Circuit’s rare opportunity to protect the public from agency misconduct: In re Jeff Lovin (Patently-O) District Court C D California: Another false marking… [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:59 am
Cooper Development, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:11 am
It encourages cooperation. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
SAP, No. 15-1145 (scope of CBM review) Post Grant Admin: Cooper v. [read post]
