Search for: "Cost v. Commonwealth" Results 441 - 460 of 671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Consider that defective air bags case above: [W]e will briefly review the history of products liability law and the crashworthiness doctrine in this Commonwealth. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am by Maureen Johnston
§ 1396a(a)(30)(A) where they do not bear a reasonable relationship to provider costs and remain in place for budgetary reasons. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 7:29 pm by Paul A. Prados
In one of the higher profile civil appeals before the Virginia Supreme Court in the past year, On March 4, 2011 the Justices relieved the petitioners who filed the case of Johnson v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
But whatever the right bottom line, we should acknowledge the cost of such a safety-first approach.[9] To be sure, when our activities cause hazards to others, we often have to cease those activities, at least if the magnitude of the hazard is seen as "unreasonable. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:21 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
Investors may envisage multiple proceedings and the cost of such proceedings are factored into the contract ab initio. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Events 4 April 2017, “The Commonwealth and Challenges to Media Freedom” conference at the Institute of Commonwealth Studies 28 April 2017, “Conference on Freedom of Expression Online,” Nicosia, Filoxenia Conference Centre, Cyprus Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Mohareb v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Limited [2017] NSWSC 288 McCallum J had to consider a series of pleaded imputations including “The plaintiff is… [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am by Michael Douglas
Inghams sought to restrain the referral to arbitration and failed at first instance; see Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd v Hannigan [2019] NSWSC 1186. [read post]
17 May 2020, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Bruce McClintock QC, told the federal court that it was “fundamental to his vindication” that Roberts-Smith be able to testify in open court after lawyers for the commonwealth produced documents which could have implications for the evidence presented in the trial. [read post]