Search for: "Cost v. Commonwealth" Results 441 - 460 of 674
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2012, 4:00 pm by Matthew Bush
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionAmicus brief of the Commonwealth of Virginia et al. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 10:01 am by John Elwood
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Amicus brief of the Commonwealth of Virginia et al. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:20 am by Milen Hristov
Compulsory insurance TypeAnnual premium in Euros Tractor unit1198.98 Trailer54.19 V. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:13 am by Darren O'Donovan
This is significant, when we compare this judgment with the attitude of the English Court of Appeal in the 1994 case of R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex parte Rees-Mogg. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
  Specifically, in view of the high costs of litigation, there was pressure from electronics companies to reduce the uncertainties of litigation by clarifying the law in regards to willful infringement and inequitable conduct, eliminating “secret” prior art, and retaining the prior user defense.[1] Additional issues included ensuring patent quality and reducing pendency by increasing third party participation in the issuance of patents, and increasing funding for the United… [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 4:42 am by Venkat
Virtumundo"; "CAN-SPAM Defendant Awarded $111k in Fees/Costs--Gordon v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Ashley unsurprisingly sued for her near-death experience which, through no fault of her own, cost her a large part of her leg and her mobility and left her with the need for at least a million dollars in future medical care, probably two or three million. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 7:21 am by Cathy Moran, Esq.
But a story on the surge in cost for health insurance based on a study by the Commonwealth Fund reminded me to remind you:  the means test allows deduction for the cost of health insurance, even if the debtor doesn’t have health insurance! [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:34 am by Marty Schwimmer
For purposes of determining whether an Internet site conducts business directed to residents of the United States under subparagraph (A)(ii), the Commission may consider, among other indicators, whether (i) the Internet site is providing goods or services to users located in the United States; (ii) there is evidence that the Internet site is not intended to provide goods and services to such users or access to or delivery of goods and services to such users; (iii) the Internet site has reasonable… [read post]