Search for: "DARE v. STATE"
Results 441 - 460
of 660
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2011, 4:35 pm
Under state law he can raise and spend as much money as he wants, and he's already spent $2.2 million on advertising. [read post]
2 Mar 2025, 9:05 am
Dare I say, unprecedented. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:15 am
The case of State v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 2:05 pm
Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 11:24 am
It is worthy of note the SEC has broad authority and it is difficult to conceive that the independent agency could exceed the powers granted to it (.. which is very different than the current Supreme Court challenge in West Virginia v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 3:54 am
Notably, the Davis v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:15 am
The case of State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 10:47 am
Circuit panel in Shelby County v. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 5:39 pm
Well into his stride Tugendhat stated that “no case of public interest had been advanced before herself. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am
Lai’s lawyer stated that the multiple cases were designed to silence and discredit [Lai] and send a clear message to others that they should not dare to criticise the Chinese or Hong Kong authorities”. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 12:36 am
As for the legal standard for tying, Epic refers to the Ninth Circuit's 2008 Cascade Health Sols. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:30 am
The Food Liability Blog discussed a case, Rosen v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 3:11 pm
See The Florida Bar v. [read post]
17 Oct 2020, 4:25 am
Alasaad v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 12:23 pm
Taney didn't do it, but, if one can accept Story's similarly-motivated opinion in Prigg v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
At the same time, he was putting pressure on the state’s Secretary of State and on the U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
The News Media Association (NMA) and National Union of Journalists issued statements stating that the changes would “weaken the flow of information from police forces to the general public, undermining the public right to know. [read post]
5 Aug 2008, 9:20 pm
Ruling on August 4 in DeJohn v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:13 pm
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
