Search for: "DOE V. GARLAND" Results 441 - 460 of 671
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2019, 6:42 am by John Jascob
Regulation BI was adopted in June 2019, became effective September 10, 2019, and firms will be required to begin complying with the rule by June 30, 2020 (XY Planning Network, LLC v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Garland: The immigration case centers on the Immigration and Nationality Act, which provides that a noncitizen who does not appear at a removal hearing shall be ordered removed in absentia. but only if she was provided “written notice required under paragraph (l) or (2) of section 1229(a). [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Democrats point to the Senate Republican majority denying President Obama’s nominee, Merrick Garland, a vote and characterize Justice Neil Gorsuch’s eventual nomination and confirmation as a “stolen seat. [read post]
29 Jul 2024, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
I'm the primary presenter on three topics: the overruling of Chevron deference in the Loper Bright case (plus a comment on the Corner Post case); the Second Amendment ruling in Rahimi and the statutory ruling on bump stocks in Garland v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 3:36 am by SHG
The holding of Bostock v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 6:48 am by Jacob Schulz, Tia Sewell
Garland conceded that Chauvin’s conviction “does not address potentially systemic policing issues in Minneapolis. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
Imagine if in 2009 Justices Stevens, Souter, and Ginsburg were replaced by Judge Garland (then age 57), former Solicitor General Seth Waxman (58), and De [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
On other questions - such as the Takings and Commerce powers - he does not seem inclined to major doctrinal change at all. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am by John Elwood
Of course, if Merrick Garland were confirmed, it would (absent recusals) end the risk of such stalemates, but that is not the only advantage of his joining the Court: during Senate courtesy calls this week, Garland revealed that, if confirmed, he would become the first male Justice to wear a jabot. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:40 am by Adam Chandler
Based on Justice Scalia’s questions in last week’s argument in Doe v. [read post]