Search for: "DOE et al v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 3,148
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2021, 10:58 am by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit vacated a preliminary injunction that prohibited California from enforcing AB 51, which was signed into law in 2019 (Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 9:37 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
Outside Statements On August 24, 2021, OCR also issued a letter addressing the federal court’s decision in Victim Rights Law Center et al. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm by Michael Douglas
However, the 1997 Model Law does not require a State to follow this mechanism.[22] Under the Anglo-Australian mechanism (a) a debt may not be discharged pursuant to Gibbs (b), but creditors are treated equally at the enforcement stage. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:52 am by Jon L. Gelman
Additionally, Monsanto admitted that it never conducted any long-term carcinogenicity studies on any of the formulations that it’s sold in the United States.Holding:The Court held that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIRRA) 7 U.S.C. ch. 6 §136 et al. does not preempt state law. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am by Simon Lester
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]