Search for: "DURHAM v. DURHAM" Results 441 - 460 of 626
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2011, 8:05 am by Angela McIlveen
Durham, 283 N.C. 671, 198 S.E.2d 537 (1973); Newsome v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 11:40 am by Emma Durand-Wood
On their BC Injury Lawyers Blog, Waterstone Law lawyers wrote about the importance of maintaining a pain journal after a car accident, and the responsibility of drivers towards young passengers, in light of the recent decision in Vedan v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm by Steve Hall
  The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:49 pm by KC Johnson
” A procedural reminder: this appeal, which Judge Beaty granted despite the only on-point precedent coming from the Middle District of Alabama, involves the City’s attempt to have the case dismissed before any discovery occurs. ---------------- One reason, perhaps, for Durham’s aggressive attempt to overturn Judge Beaty’s decision came last week, when the Supreme Court considered a grand jury immunity case, Rehberg v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:08 am by New Books Script
48 new acquisitions for the Osgoode Hall Law School Library, including 41 from 2011: HD 58.6 N4334 1999 Negotiating on behalf of others : advice to lawyers, business executives, sports agents, diplomats, politicians, and everybody else edited by Robert H. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:51 am by Cicely Wilson
The Durham Statement Two Years Later: Open Access and the Law, Richard Danner, Kelly Leong and Wayne V. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:51 am by Cicely Wilson
The Durham Statement Two Years Later: Open Access and the Law, Richard Danner, Kelly Leong and Wayne V. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 10:07 am by Rachit Buch
Clear principles limiting the exercise of this power were established in the case of R v Governor of Durham Prisoner ex parte Haridal Singh [1984] 1 WLR 704 (now often referred to as “the Hardial Singh principles”). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am by judith
Over the past couple of years, there has been a great deal of discussion — particularly in relation to the Durham Statement [1] — about technical standards and preservation issues for law reviews that publish openly and exclusively online. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm by KC Johnson
” Indeed, Durham fumed, “the district court never considered” the issue. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:12 pm by admin
I had the pleasure of watching my dear friend and colleague Maureen Leonard argue Paul v. [read post]