Search for: "Daniel File" Results 441 - 460 of 8,172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 9:55 am by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol The Department of Justice today filed a civil antitrust lawsuit to block AT&T Inc. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 4:00 pm
By Daniel ExnerDivorce Lawyer, Cordell & CordellIf your state does not have a time limit on how long alimony lasts and are wanting to retire, you should file a motion to modify immediately. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 1:58 pm by Legal Profession Prof
The Illinois Administrator has filed a complaint alleging misconduct in the attorney's two driving under the influence convictions. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:00 am by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol Nic Economides (NYU - Stern) argues that Broadband Openness Rules Are Fully Justified by Economic Research. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:00 am by Paul Caron
Daniel Hemel (Chicago), The Living Anti-Injunction Act, 104 Va. [read post]
3 Apr 2013, 6:00 am by JA Hodnicki
Daniel Sokol Erik Hovenkamp (Northwestern ) discusses Tacit Patent Pooling. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 8:03 pm by Adam Steinman
Allan reviews a recent article by Daniel Klerman & Greg Reilly, Forum Selling, the current draft... [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 3:15 am by Steve Clowney
Maybe privitized streets aren't such a good idea: In September, the operator of the Indiana Toll Road filed for bankruptcy, eight years after inking a $3.8 billion, 75-year concession for the road with the administration of Governor Mitch Daniels. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:45 am by JA Hodnicki
ABSTRACT: Until 2005, indirect purchaser class actions were filed and remained almost exclusively in state courts... [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 12:00 am by JA Hodnicki
ABSTRACT: On April 11, 2012, media outlets exploded with the news that the Department of Justice had filed... [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 11:00 am
February 2003: prominent New York real estate lawyer Daniel D. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to the plaintiff's assertion, there was no evidence of any continuous ongoing relationship between the plaintiff and the defendants after the file was returned and, therefore, the continuous representation doctrine is not applicable (see Shumsky v Eisenstein, 96 NY2d 164, 168-171; Marro v Handwerker, Marchelos & Gayner, 1 AD3d 488; Daniels v Lebit, 299 AD2d 310; Wester v Sussman, 287 AD2d 618). [read post]