Search for: "David v. District of Columbia" Results 441 - 460 of 800
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm by INFORRM
Structural Surveillance, Iowa Law Review, Forthcoming, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, American University Washington College of Law; University of the District of ColumbiaDavid A. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 11:48 am by Jenna Greene
Backing the EPA was a coalition of downwind states, led by New York and including Maryland and the District of Columbia. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 10:41 am by Roger Clegg
What’s more, the post’s basic argument seems to me indistinguishable from arguments a half-century ago that the Fourteenth Amendment should not be read to ban segregated schools in the states because Congress in the 1860s and ‘70s set up and funded segregated schools in the District of Columbia. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 12:34 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, however, found in its 2-1 ruling that the EPA was exercising a valid use of the agency's enforcement discretion by entering into agreements with the farms. * * * The EPA maintains its policy is the most effective option while methods of tracking farm emissions are studied. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 11:01 am
And in perhaps the most influential recent critique of court-led social reform, Ross Sandler and David Schoenbrod used a major IDEA class action, Jose P. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the District of Columbia 2009) (Convertino v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 10:27 am by Molly Runkle
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 6:28 am
Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2004.Rudenstine, David. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
  While at one point, same-sex marriage was legal in only a single state (Massachusetts) and expressly prohibited in forty-four, it is now expressly permitted in thirteen (including California, by virtue of the dismissal of the appeal on Prop 8 in Perry) and in the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 7:52 am
David Stras, a blog contributor, is counsel on the petitioner's brief.] [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 10:36 am by Marty Lederman
”  (In litigation in the District of Columbia, this is the applicable rule. [read post]